Peer Review reports
From: Laparoscopic repair of high rectovaginal fistula: Is it technically feasible?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 May 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Jun 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Saravanan Senthil Kumaran |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Jun 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Wexner |
| 2 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andreas D. Ebert |
| 18 Aug 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Saravanan Senthil Kumaran |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Aug 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Aug 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Saravanan Senthil Kumaran |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Aug 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 20 Sep 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Saravanan Senthil Kumaran |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 20 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 28 Sep 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Saravanan Senthil Kumaran |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 28 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Oct 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Oct 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2482-5-20 |
You can find further information about peer review here.