Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographics of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant therapy (GBNAT) and surgical resection

From: Predictors for resectability and survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant therapy

Characteristics

Number of patients, n = 41

Sex (M:F)

27:14

Age (years), mean (range)

63.5 (39–80)

Location: Head: body: tail

17:18: 6

Naïve: failed exploration

32:9

Chemotherapy(CT)#: chemoradiation therapy (CRT)*

25:16

Response rate

21 (51.2%)

CR: PR

2:19

Surgery: non-surgery

20:21

Successful resection

17 (41.5%)

Surgical procedure

 

Whipple: central pancreatectomy: distal pancreatectomy

6: 5: 6

Surgical margin

 

R0: R1: R2

14: 2:1

Pre-GBNAT tumor marker level

 

CEA

24.9 ± 28.6

CA199

1641 ± 3697

CA125

51.1 ± 51.9

Post-GBNAT tumor marker level

 

CEA

20.3 ± 51.2

CA199

1820 ± 4780

CA125

82.3 ± 135.5

Progression-free survival, median (mean ± SD), months

9.0 (18.4 ± 3.0)

Surgery vs non-surgery

15.0 (32.1 ± 6.0) vs 4.0 (6.7 ± 2.0)

Overall survival, median (mean ± SD), months

12.5 (20.8 ± 4.0)

Surgery vs non-surgery

21.0 (33.1 ± 7.0) vs 9.0 (10.5 ± 2.0)

  1. #17 patients received phase I/II GOFT, 8 patients with GOFS, *7 patients received CCRT Tainan program, 9 patients received gemcitabine induction chemotherapy and reduced dose gemcitabine with R/T.