Peer Review reports
From: Analysis of operative efficacy for giant pituitary adenoma
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jackson A. Gondim |
| 6 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - sumit sinha |
| 25 Mar 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Shousen Wang |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 25 Mar 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 May 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jackson A. Gondim |
| 24 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Shousen Wang |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 16 Aug 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Shousen Wang |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 Aug 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Aug 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Aug 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2482-14-59 |
You can find further information about peer review here.