Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Open preperitoneal versus anterior approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: a randomized study

Original Submission
7 May 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
7 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Aly Saber
Resubmission - Version 2
7 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Aly Saber
Resubmission - Version 4
7 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Aly Saber
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dieter Berger
20 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jochen Grommes
4 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Aly Saber
Resubmission - Version 6
4 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
18 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jochen Grommes
9 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Aly Saber
Resubmission - Version 7
9 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
1 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jochen Grommes
15 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Aly Saber
Resubmission - Version 8
15 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 8
22 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Aly Saber
Resubmission - Version 9
22 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
14 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
30 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2482-12-22

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page