Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - J Bradley White |
1 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheng-Hsien Lu |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheng-Hsien Lu |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
8 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheng-Hsien Lu |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
8 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
22 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheng-Hsien Lu |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
22 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
22 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheng-Hsien Lu |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
22 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
13 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheng-Hsien Lu |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
13 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
26 Jun 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Jul 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2482-12-12 |
You can find further information about peer review here.