Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Topical haemostatic agents for skin wounds: a systematic review

Trial

Patients

Intervention

Comparison

Outcomes

Barret JP, 1999

42 pediatric burn patients (21 vs. 21)

Epinephrine 1:10.000 (and thrombin 1:300.000) (topical)

Saline (and thrombin)

Blood loss in ml and ml/cm2, Ht, Hb up to 8 hours post-operatively, blood transfusions

Brezel BS, 1987

32 burn patients (32 vs. 32)

Epinephrine 1:200.000 (topical)

Thrombin

Blood loss visually estimated from photographs 5 minutes post-operatively

Gacto P, 2008

56 burn patients (25 vs. 31)

Epinephrine-lidocaine Subcutaneous 1:500.000

Saline

Overall blood loss visually estimated, use of electrocautery, days hydrocolloid maintained

Netscher DT, 1996

52 patients (12 vs. 8 vs. 12 vs. 7 vs. 13)

Epinephrine/K-Y jelly 1:50.000 (topical)

Epinephrine spray, thrombin, K-Y jelly, mineral oil.

Time to haemostasis (minutes)

Carucci DJ, 1984

24 patients (6 vs. 6 vs. 12)

Phenylephrine 1:20.000 (topical)

Thrombin

Blood loss measured by Hb in paper disks

Greenhalgh DG, 1999

34 burn patients (<15% TBSA) (34 vs. 34)

Fibrin sealant (duoflo Y-shaped adapter)

Placebo

Blood loss visually estimated and measured by Hb in sponges, donor site healing viewed on photographs

Nervi C, 2001

61 burn patients (donor site 2-8% TBSA) (61 vs. 61)

Fibrin sealant (duoflo Y-shaped adapter)

Placebo

Time to haemostasis

Drake DB, 2003

34 patients with SSG areas 5-15 cm (34 vs. 34)

Fibrin sealant (Vivostat)

Thrombin

Time to haemostasis (seconds)

Steenfos HH, 1998

5 patients (7 donor sites) (7 vs. 7)

Alginate dressing

Fine mesh gauze

Blood loss measured by iron content of dressings