Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence and mortality rate of abdominal surgical emergencies in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Surgery volume 24, Article number: 35 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Abdominal surgical emergencies remain prevalent in various healthcare settings, particularly in regions with limited access to basic surgical care, such as Africa. The aim of this literature review is to systematically assess publications on abdominal surgical emergencies in adults in sub-Saharan Africa to estimate their prevalence and mortality rate.

Methodology

A systematic review was conducted. The latest search was performed on October 31, 2022. We estimated the pooled prevalence with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for each abdominal surgical emergency, as well as overall postoperative mortality and morbidity rates.

Results

A total of 78 studies were included, and 55.1% were single-center retrospective and monocentric studies. The mean age of the patients was 32.5 years, with a sex ratio of 1.94. The prevalence of each abdominal surgical emergency among all of them was as follows: appendicitis: 30.0% (95% CI: 26.1–33.9); bowel obstruction: 28.6% (95% CI: 25.3–31.8); peritonitis: 26.6% (95% CI: 22.2–30.9); strangulated hernias: 13,4% (95% CI: 10,3–16,5) and abdominal trauma: 9.4% (95% CI: 7.5–11.3). The prevalence of complications was as follows: mortality rate: 7.4% (95% CI: 6.0-8.8); overall postoperative morbidity: 24.2% (95% CI: 19.4–29.0); and surgical site infection 14.4% (95% CI: 10.86–18.06).

Conclusion

Our study revealed a high prevalence of postoperative complications associated with abdominal surgical emergencies in sub-Saharan Africa. More research and efforts should be made to improve access and quality of patient care.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Emergency surgery refers to surgical procedures that cannot be safely postponed without adversely affecting the patient’s clinical condition. It is typically conducted urgently, often within a brief period after the patient’s admission to the hospital, usually within hours. This situation presents a distinctive context compared to elective surgery, as patients undergoing emergency procedures require special monitoring due to their lack of preparation and the physiological disorders that can further compromise them in addition to the surgical stress [1].

Abdominal surgical emergencies remain frequent in practice regardless of the context. Africa represents one of the regions most affected by the lack of access to basic surgical care, particularly in emergency settings. In fact, it is estimated that 93% of its population does not have access to emergency surgery when they need it [1].

This represents a significant burden in addition to other public health emergencies, such as HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria. Abdominal surgical emergencies accounted for a large proportion of surgeries performed in African hospitals, with a frequency varying between 20 and 22.7% [2, 3].

Patients with abdominal surgical emergencies, when compared to those operated on in a scheduled setting, have their risk of death multiplied up to five times [4]. The factors that can explain this higher rate of complications in emergency surgery are: the lack of patient preparation in the context of urgency, acute physiological disorders caused by urgent pathologies such as sepsis, hypovolemia, and hydro-electrolytic disorders. Additionally, comorbid conditions that may be present in emergency patients are often not optimized, increasing the anesthetic risk of postoperative complications [4].

Additionally, these deaths remain higher in developing countries, ranging from 4.9 to 13.2% [4, 5, 9].

Furthermore, there is a significant lack of data in Sub-Saharan Africa. Indeed, the majority of these countries do not have national registries or audit systems to monitor surgical care and associated complications [6].

To improve the quality of care for patients and tailor risk assessment for our specific context, there is an urgent need for quality data on this topic [7]. This will address the limited understanding of the burden of abdominal surgical emergencies and help identify areas for improvement .

To better understand this topic, we performed a systematic review to assess publications on abdominal surgical emergencies in adults in sub-Saharan Africa to estimate their prevalence and mortality rate.

Methodology

We conducted a systematic review to study abdominal surgical emergencies in adults in Sub-Saharan Africa.

The main objectives were to:

  • Determine the prevalence of each abdominal surgical emergency (appendicitis, bowel obstruction, peritonitis, strangulated hernias and abdominal traumas) in Sub-Saharan Africa;

  • Determine the pooled prevalence of postoperative mortality and overall morbidity associated with abdominal surgical emergencies in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Research strategy

The protocol of this systematic review was registered at https://www.researchregistry.com/ (reviewregistry1771). Two individuals, AN and LT, jointly conducted the study search, inclusion, and data extraction.

This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines [27]. An extensive search was performed on the following online databases:

  • Pub Med/Medline and;

  • African Journal Online.

The keywords used in the search process included the following:

  • “emergency general surgery OR emergency laparotomy” OR “emergency laparotomy OR emergency general surgery,”

  • “Abdomen, Acute/surgery“[MeSH] and;

  • “Africa South of the Sahara“[MeSH].

The search was carried out using various combinations of these terms. Additionally, a supplementary manual search was conducted on the following search engines: ResearchGate and Google Scholar. Furthermore, we checked the references of all included articles to find relevant publications. The latest search was conducted on October 31, 2022.

The retrieved references were managed using Rayyan software [28]. Zotero software was used to download the references, remove duplicates, and perform primary and secondary selection analyses.

Inclusion criteria

Using the PICOS framework (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Results, Study type), the inclusion criteria were as follows:

  • Patients: Adults (over 15 years) with abdominal surgical emergencies (appendicitis, acute intestinal obstruction, peritonitis, strangulated hernias and abdominal traumas);

  • Interventions: Surgical treatment;

  • Comparison: None;

  • Outcomes: Prevalence of each emergency, prevalence of mortality, and overall morbidity;

  • Study Type: Observational, randomized or nonrandomized, prospective or retrospective studies with more than 20 patients published in English or French.

Exclusion criteria

We excluded studies that described the following:

  • Only obstetric emergencies;

  • Only postoperative complications;

  • Only imaging or anesthesia data;

  • Only patients operated on with laparoscopy;

  • Only one surgical emergency;

  • Mixed cohorts with other surgical emergencies where data on abdominal emergencies could not be extracted;

  • Mixed cohorts with elective and emergency surgery where data on abdominal emergencies could not be extracted.

Letters to editors, literature reviews, and duplicated studies were also excluded.

Data extraction

The extracted data included study type, year of publication, country, total number of patients, age, sex, number of each surgical emergency, surgical site infection and mortality and overall morbidity rates.

For data extraction of postoperative outcomes, we considered the following:

  • Surgical site infection: infection at the abdominal wound during the postoperative period, whether superficial or deep;

  • Overall morbidity: the total number of complications (of any type) among the total number of patients;

  • Mortality: the number of reported deaths among the total number of patients in the study, regardless of the evaluation period (at 30 days, 90 days, during hospitalization, or unspecified).

Quality assessment

The Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale (NOS) (selection criteria and outcome criteria) was used to assess the quality of the included studies [8,9,10,11].

  • A score of 6 was considered good quality.

  • A score of 4 or 5 as moderate quality; and.

  • A score of 3 or less was considered poor quality.

Risk of bias assessment

A funnel plot was used to depict publication bias using Jamovi software Version 2.4.1.0. A rank correlation test with Kendall’s tau statistic was employed to detect asymmetry when p ≤ 0.05, indicating a publication bias.

Data analysis and statistical methods

Statistical analysis was performed using R Studio software Version 1.2.5042. Graphs and maps were created using Microsoft Excel. For qualitative variables, the number with their proportions were described. For quantitative variables, the mean and standard deviation were used.

A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the combined prevalence with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for each abdominal surgical emergency and the overall mortality and morbidity rates in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Heterogeneity among the studies was tested using the I2 test. A random-effects model was used when I2 > 50%, and a fixed-effects model was used when I2 ≤ 50%.

Results

We found 112 articles in the databases and 224 through manual internet searches. After removing duplicates, 198 articles were evaluated. We identified 79 studies on abdominal surgical emergencies over the explored period of 32 years (1981–2022). After excluding articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, we had 78 articles for the qualitative synthesis, of which 75 were included in the quantitative synthesis. The PRISMA flow chart is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the search process and study selection

Full size image

Study characteristics

In total, there were 38,187 patients with a range of 48 to 3,717 patients per study. The mean age of the patients was 32.5 years, with a range of 22.9 to 47 years. The sex ratio was 1.94, with 65.9% male (n = 17,656) and 34.1% female (n = 9,097). Most studies were retrospective (55.1%, n = 43). The quality of the studies was judged as good in 12.8% (n = 10), moderate in 50% (n = 39), and low in 37.2% (n = 29).

Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the characteristics of the different studies used for the literature review.

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review (n = 78) (A)
Full size table
Table 2 Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review (n = 78) (B)
Full size table

Studies were found in 20 countries. The majority of studies originated from West Africa (53.8%, n = 42), followed by East Africa (28.8%, n = 17), Central Africa (14.1%, n = 11), and Southern Africa (3.8%, n = 3) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Map of Sub-Saharan Africa showing the number of studies on abdominal surgical emergencies per country (n = 78)

Full size image

There was a progressive increase in the number of studies published over the years, with 55 studies (70.5%) published after 2015.

Figure 3 represents the trend in the number of publications on abdominal surgical emergencies in Sub-Saharan Africa over the last 32 years.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Trend in the number of publications on abdominal surgical emergencies in Sub-Saharan Africa (n = 78)

Full size image

Meta-analysis

The heterogeneity was high accross all studies, and a random effect model was used for the meta-analysis. There was a high publication bias for the meta-analysis of outcomes, as represented in the funnel plot at Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Funnel plots for assessment of publication bias in the three study outcomes in the meta-analysis. A: Mortality (tau = 0.343; p < 0.001); B: Overall morbidity (tau = 0.350; p < 0.001); C: Surgical site infection (tau = 0.461; p < 0.001).

Full size image

The results of the meta-analysis estimating the pooled prevalence of each abdominal surgical emergency and the postoperative complications are detailed in Table 3.

Table 3 Meta-analysis estimating the pooled prevalence of each abdominal surgical emergency and postoperative complications
Full size table

The prevalence of each cause among abdominal surgical emergencies in Sub-Saharan Africa was as follows:

  • Appendicitis: 30.0% (95% CI: 26.1–33.9);

  • Acute intestinal obstruction: 28.6% (95% CI: 25.3–31.8);

  • Peritonitis: 26.5% (95% CI: 22.2–30.9);

  • Strangulated hernias: 13,4% (95% CI: 10,3–16,5);

  • Abdominal traumas: 9.4% (95% CI: 7.5–11.3).

The prevalence of complications associated with abdominal surgical emergencies was as follows:

  • Mortality: 7.4% (95% CI: 6.0-8.8);

  • Overall postoperative morbidity: 24.2% (95% CI: 19.4–29.0);

  • Postoperative infections: 14.4% (95% CI: 10.8–18.0).

The Figs. 5, 6 and 7 represent the forest plots estimating the pooled prevalence of post operatives complications.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot estimating the pooled prevalence of overall mortality

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Forest plot estimating the pooled prevalence of overall morbidity

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Forest plot estimating the pooled prevalence of surgical site infection

Full size image

Discussion

Several research studies on abdominal surgical emergencies in Africa have been conducted; however, the data have often been reported in specific settings. The aim of this review was to assess the prevalence of each surgical emergency among all causes of abdominal surgical emergencies and to determine the prevalence of postoperative complications in Sub-Saharan Africa. This review included 78 research studies published over a 32-year period involving 38,187 patients.

In our literature review, acute appendicitis was the leading cause of abdominal surgical emergencies in Sub-Saharan Africa, with a combined prevalence of 30.0% (95% CI: 26.1–33.9). Our review encompasses 112 articles from 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The majority of studies on this topic were conducted within a single country or institution. This shows how our pooled data appears to be representative, providing insight into the prevalence of appendicitis in sub-saharan Africa. Globally, it is the most frequent cause of digestive surgical emergencies. Its prevalence ranges from approximately 44.2% and 62.8% depending on countries [87, 88]. For a condition with well-codified treatment and not requiring a significant amount of resources, the associated mortality remains high. It was estimated in 2019 that out of 17.7 million cases worldwide, there were 33,400 deaths [89]. In addition, existing data suggest a mortality rate of 54 per 1000 appendectomies in Sub-Saharan Africa, compared to 3.03 per 1000 appendectomies in developed countries [90]. This significant difference is mainly attributed to difficulties in accessing surgical care and diagnostic delays.

Our review revealed that acute intestinal obstruction had a prevalence of 28.6% (95% CI: 25.3–31.8) among abdominal surgical emergencies in Sub-Saharan Africa. It constitutes the leading cause of surgical emergencies in different studies, accounting for 43.2% in some studies [79].

The causes of intestinal obstructions differ in frequency depending on the geographical area. In developed countries, obstruction due to adhesions and tumors are predominant, while colonic volvulus is more prevalent in Sub-Saharan Africa [2, 91, 92]. Associated mortality reached 9.2% in certain series in Africa, mainly due to long delays in seeking medical care and the occurrence of bowel necrosis [91].

Strangulated hernias had a pooled prevalence of 13,4% (95% CI: 10,3–16,5). With this important rate of emergency surgery for hernia, efforts should be made to improve the availability and accessibility of surgery for the entire population [93]. This will help to prevent the occurrence of strangulation and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. A recent literature review on inguinal hernias in Sub-Saharan Africa showed that patients operated on in emergencies had a significantly higher risk of death than those operated on electively (OR = 47) [94].

Peritonitis was ranked third, with a prevalence of 26.5% (95% CI: 22.2–30.9). The etiologies are diverse and are particularly dominated by complicated appendicitis, ranging from 35.7 to 25.5% [95, 96]. With the improvement in medical treatment, including antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors, perforations due to gastroduodenal ulcers and typhoid fever remain less frequent as causes of peritonitis [97, 98]. The occurrence of complications mainly depends on the promptness of initiating treatment [97].

Traumas have a significant impact in terms of frequency on healthcare systems. In our review, abdominal traumas (penetrating and blunt) had a combined prevalence of 9.4% (95% CI: 7.5–11.3). The relatively lower prevalence of abdominal trauma among abdominal emergency surgeries, ranking 6th, may be attributed to advancements in nonoperative management. This leads to fewer surgical interventions due to trauma in abdominal surgical emergency cohorts. However, it is crucial to identify the factors influencing the outcomes of abdominal trauma in Africa to enhance patient care and minimize morbidity and mortality rates [99, 100].

The combined overall mortality was 7.4% (95% CI: 6.0-8.8) in our literature review. Patients undergoing abdominal emergency surgery, when compared to other patients receiving elective surgery, have a higher risk of death (up to 5 times) [4]. In addition, mortality related to surgical emergencies remains consistently high in the world’s poorest countries, where it is estimated to be between 4.9% and 13.2% [4,5,9]. To improve both the availability and quality of treatments, it is essential to have a detailed understanding of the treatments and associated outcomes for patients, particularly operative mortality. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery recommends the compulsory assessment of postoperative mortality in all healthcare facilities by 2030 as one of the six measures to evaluate the safety of a country’s surgical system [1, 101]. Analyzing factors related to early postoperative death would enable preventive measures to better plan treatment and postoperative outcomes.

The overall morbidity was 24.2% (95% CI: 19.4–19.0) in abdominal surgical emergencies in Sub-Saharan Africa. This high rate is particularly associated with the occurrence of postoperative infections, which are the main complication with an estimated frequency of 14.4% (95% CI: 10.86–18.06). The high rate of complications could be mainly related to a lack of access to surgical care when needed. In fact, financial and geographic components have previously been identified as barriers in Sub-Saharan Africa [10, 102].

Limitations and perspectives

This review primarily focused on published data collected from databases and excluded unpublished studies such as dissertations or reports, as well as certain data from nonindexed databases or paper-based journals. This exclusion may result in publication bias, as shown by funnel plots with statistically significant Kendall tau tests. There is also a need for improvement and standardization in future studies to elevate the overall level of evidence and effectively guide health system policies.Furthermore, the review did not investigate additional important topics, such as the cost of surgical procedures and patient satisfaction.

The I2 test revealed significant heterogeneity, indicating that the included studies may not be comparable when considering design, sample size, patient characteristics, and follow-up. More than half of the included studies were retrospective, single-center studies. Also, due to the non-indexed nature of most articles, it is possible that some published articles were not identified in our search.

As a perspective, given that our review revealed a non-negligible prevalence of death and complications in abdominal surgical emergencies, future studies should be conducted with a more specific focus on exploring the factors associated with mortality and complications in abdominal surgical emergencies. This emphasis on understanding these factors can contribute to the development of preventive measures in health systems and patient management, aiming to effectively reduce the overall rate of deaths in such cases.

Despite these limitations, our review provides significant insights and an overall perspective on the state of research and practice in abdominal emergency surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa. This knowledge can be used to direct future research efforts and to improve the quality of care and identify areas for further improvement.

Conclusion

Our study suggested a high prevalence of complications, such as deaths and infections. Appendicitis is the main cause of these surgical emergencies. Therefore, it is essential to make efforts to improve access to and quality of patient care. With the relatively low quality of data and heterogeneity of studies, more research is needed to fully understand the quality of care and outcomes for patients undergoing these procedures.

Data availability

Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet Lond Engl. 2015;386(9993):569–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Magagi IA, Adamou H, Habou O, Magagi A, Halidou M, Ganiou K. Urgences chirurgicales digestives en afrique subsaharienne: étude prospective d’une série de 622 patients à l’Hôpital national de Zinder, NigerDigestive surgical emergencies in Sub-saharan Africa: a prospective study of a series of 622 patients at the National Hospital of Zinder, Niger. Bull Société Pathol Exot. 2017;110(3):191–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaye I, Leye PA, Traoré MM, Ndiaye PI, Bah MD, Fall ML et al. Prise en charge péri opératoire des urgences chirurgicales abdominales chez l’adulte Au CHU Aristide Le Dantec. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;24.

  4. Havens JM, Peetz AB, Do WS, Cooper Z, Kelly E, Askari R, et al. The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(2):306–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ngowe NM, Mboudou E, Ngo-Nonga B, Mouafo TF, Ze MJ, Bahebeck J et al. La mortalité hospitalière Des Urgences Chirurgicales De L’adulte à Yaoundé. Rev Afr Chir Spéc. 2009;3(5).

  6. Biccard BM, Madiba TE, Kluyts HL, Munlemvo DM, Madzimbamuto FD, Basenero A, et al. Perioperative patient outcomes in the surgical outcomes study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. The Lancet. 2018;391(10130):1589–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ndong A, Diallo AC, Tendeng JN, Diallo AI, Diao ML, Sagna SA, et al. QSIRS can improve accuracy of QSOFA and SIRS in prediction of mortality in surgical emergencies. Surg J. 2021;7:e199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Oxford; 2000.

  9. Ehlers VU, Kohler CF, Tefera A, Lutge E, Clarke DL. The burden of emergency abdominal surgery heavily outweighs elective procedures in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. J Surg Res. 2021;259:414–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Genetu A, Gezahegn D, Getachew H, Deneke A, Bekele A. Financial risk of emergency abdominal surgery: a cross sectional study from Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spence RT, Panieri E, Rayne SL. A multicentre evaluation of emergency abdominal surgery in South Africa: results from the GlobalSurg-1 South Africa study. South Afr Med J Suid-Afr Tydskr Vir Geneeskd. 2016;106(2):163–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adamu A, Maigatari M, Lawal K, Iliyasu M. Waiting time for emergency abdominal surgery in Zaria, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2010;10(1):46–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ademe Y, Seyoum N, Lemma R. Surgical management of acute abdomen in adult patients: experience from a private hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2022;32(4):729–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Agboola JO, Olatoke SA, Rahman GA. Pattern and presentation of acute abdomen in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Niger Med J J Niger Med Assoc. 2014;55(3):266–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmed A, Dauda M, Garba S, Ukwenya Y. Emergency abdominal surgery in Zaria, Nigeria. S Afr J Surg. 2010;48(2):59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ajao OG. Abdominal emergencies in a tropical African population. J Br Surg. 1981;68(5):345–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Almeimoune Abdoulhamidoua B, Seidou Alajib C, Cisseb F, Skoita, Siriman Koitab D, Andréa K, Diallo B et al. Anesthesiological management of acute surgical abdomens in adults at the anesthesia, ICU and emergency medicine department of the Gabriel Toure university hospital, Bamako, Mali. Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v9i04.mp01

  18. Assouto P, Tchaou B, Kangni N, Padonou JL, Lokossou T, Djiconkpodé I, et al. Early outcome of digestive surgery in a tropical setting. Med Trop Rev Corps Sante Colon. 2009;69(5):477–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Attipou K, Kanassoua K, Sosseh D. Urgences chirurgicales abdominales non traumatiques de l’adulte Au Chu Todoin De Lome (Bilan De 5 annees). J Rech Sci L’Université Lomé. 2005 [cité 27 oct 2022];7(2).

  20. Awori MN, Jani PG. Surgical implications of abdominal pain in patients presenting to the Kenyatta National Hospital casualty department with abdominal pain. East Afr Med J. 2005;82(6):307–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ayenew Z, Gizaw AT, Workneh D, Fentahun N. Outcome of non-traumatic surgical acute abdomen in nekemte referral hospital southwest Ethiopia: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Surg Curr Res. 2016;7(282):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ba PA. Determinants of mortality for digestive emergency surgery in low-income countries: the case of Senegal. Clin Surg. 2021;4(9):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bang GA, Moto GB, Ngoumfe JCC, Boukar YME, Tim FT, Savom EP, et al. Complications of surgical management of non-traumatic acute abdomens of digestive origin at the Yaoundé central hospital, Cameroon (November 2019-July 2020). Med Trop Sante Int. 2021;1(4):mtsi–2021.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Camara M, Kone AC, Camara T, Diawara Y, Dembele BT, Traore D et al. Aspects Épidémiologiques, Cliniques et Thérapeutiques des Urgences Abdominales Chirurgicales à l’Hôpital Préfectoral De Siguiri (Guinée). Health Sci Dis. 2021;22(6).

  25. Coulibaly M, Traoré D, Togola B, Sanogo S, Bengaly B, Kanté A et al. Abdomens Aigus Chirurgicaux A Koutiala: diagnostic et traitement. Mali Méd. 2019;34(4).

  26. Daddy H, Chaibou MS, Gagara M, Magagi A, Moussa BM, Dillé I. Didier J LPrise en charge anesthésiologique des urgences abdominales à l’Hôpital National Niamey(HNN).RAMUR, 2020. 25(1). calameo.com. 2022 [cité 1 janv 10apr. J.-C.]; Disponible sur: https://www.calameo.com/read/004568293824731a80cb7

  27. Debrah SA, Diallo A. Clinical spectrum of acute abdomen in Cape Coast. 2012 [cité 11 nov 2022]; Disponible sur: http://www.webmedcentral.com/

  28. DEMBELE KS. Urgences chirurgicales digestives Au Centre De Sante De Reference De Douentza. J Chirugie Spéc Mali. 2021;1(2):41–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dewulf E. Abdominal emergencies: a four-year experience in Central Africa. Trop Doct. 1986;16(3):129–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Diallo FK, Dyatta Mayombo N, Ndjota, Nyamatsiengui H, Mpira YM, Mvé Ndong FB, Ipouka Doussiemou S, Ondo N’Dong F. Urgences chirurgicales digestives au centre hospitalier universitaire de libreville : aspects epidemiologiques, cliniques et therapeutiques – revue de Chirurgie d’Afrique Centrale (RECAC), N°3, Volume 18 Juin 2020.

  31. Mbaye Diaw D, Barboza EHN, Diop P, Ba P, Leye P, Ndiaye F, Ndiaye E. Diouf ;Pratique anesthésique pour urgences chirurgicales abdominales à l’hôpital régional de Thies RAMUR Tome 23, n°3-2018.

  32. Didier James L, Abdoulaye MB, Dakal OA, Adamou H, Ide K, Hama Y. Facteurs De morbidité et de mortalité des urgences abdominales non traumatiques à l’hôpital national de Niamey. J Afr Chir Digest. 2020;20(2):30763081.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Diop PS, Ba PA, Ka I, Ndoye JM, Fall B. Prise en charge diagnostique des abdomens aigus non traumatiques Au service des urgences de l’hôpital général de Grand Yoff: à propos de 504 cas. Bull Med Owendo. 2011;13(37):42–6.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dossouvi T, *1 KK, Kanassoua1 T, Mouzou2 I, Kassegne3 E, Gueouguede PR 1. Plante1, ED Dosseh Urgences chirurgicales digestives dans Un pays en développement (Togo). Jaccr Afr. 2021;5(3):129–35.

  35. Doui DA, Ngarhio L, Issa MPA, Tchebemou-Ngabi A, Nali NM. Les douleurs abdominales aigues de l’adulte. Prise en charge et pronostic Au service Des Urgences Chirurgicales De l’Hôpital De l’Amitié à Bangui. Rev Afr Chir Spéc. 2009;3(5).

  36. Doumi EBA, Mohammed MI. Acute bbdomen at El Obeid Hospital,Western Sudan. Sudan J Med Sci. 2009 [cité 11 nov 2022];4(2).

  37. Engbang JP, Essola B, Moukoury TJK, Chasim CB, Toumaleu GM, Motah M, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of Digestive emergencies in two hospitals in Douala (Cameroon). Surg Sci. 2021;12(6):174–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gaye I, Leye PA, Traoré MM, Ndiaye PI, Ba EHB, Bah MD et al. Prise en charge péri opératoire des urgences chirurgicales abdominales chez l’adulte Au CHU Aristide Le Dantec. Pan Afr Med J. 2016 [cité 30 juin 2017];24.

  39. Gbessi DG, Dossou FM, Ezin EFM 2, Hadonou A 2, Imorou-Souaibou Y, Mehinto LI. DK1, Olory- Togbe JL1, Bagnan KO1. Prise en charge des urgences chirurgicales abdominales à l’hôpital de zone de Comè au Bénin à propos de 169 cas.RAMUR Tome 20 -N°2-2015.

  40. Gebre S. Causes and outcome of surgically treated non-traumatic Surgical Acute Abdomen in Suhul General Hospital, Shire, Northwest Tigray, Ethiopia, a Retrospective Study. Am Acad Sci Res J Eng Technol Sci. 2016;16(1):74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Admasu G, Beyene T, Hagisso S. Management outcome and associated factors of surgically treated non traumatic acute abdomen at attat hospital, Gurage Zone, Ethiopia. Int J Surg Res Pract. 2019;6.

  42. Hagos M. Acute abdomen in adults: a two year experience in Mekelle, Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J Janv. 2015;53(1):19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hanks L, Lin CP, Tefera G, Seyoum N. Abdominal surgical emergencies at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital in Ethiopia; a shifting paradigm. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2014;19(1):90–4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Harissou A, Ibrahim AM, Oumarou H, Mansour A, Amadou M, Ousseni EA et al. Retard diagnostique et implication pronostique en milieu africain. Cas des urgences en chirurgie digestive à l’hôpital national de zinder, niger. Eur Sci J ESJ. 2015;11(12).

  45. Harouna YD. Deux ans De Chirurgie digestive d’urgence à l’hôpital national de Niamey (Niger). Médecine Afr Noire. 2001;6.

  46. Ibrahim NA, Oludara MA, Ajani A, Mustafa I, Balogun R, Idowu O, et al. Non-trauma surgical emergencies in adults: Spectrum, challenges and outcome of care. Ann Med Surg. 2015;4(4):325–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kambire JL, Sanon BG, Zare C, Kambou T. Etiologies et pronostic des urgences chirurgicales digestives Au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso). J Rech Sci L’Université Lomé. 2017;19(3):305–7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. KAMBIré JL, ZIDA M, OUéDrAOGO S, OUEDRAOGO S. TRAORE S. Les urgences en chirurgie digestive Au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Régional De Ouahigouya (Burkina Faso) à Propos De 394 cas: emergencies in digestive surgery at the Regional Teaching Hospital of Ouahigouya (Burkina Faso) about 394 cases. Sci Santé. 2018;41(1).

  49. Theresia AK, Fassil T, Rashid MM, Sakurani TB. Causes of surgical acute abdomen in adults at St. Francis Hospital: a semi-urban hospital at Kilombero, Tanzania. Case Rep Int. 2020 [cité 11 nov 2022];7.

  50. Kassegne I, Sewa EV, Alassani F, Kanassoua KK, Adabra K, Tchangai B, et al. Prise en charge des urgences chirurgicales abdominales Au centre hospitalier régional de Dapaong (Togo). J Afr Hépato-Gastroentérologie. 2016;10(2):85–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Katswere J, Attolou S, Natta N’tcha, Mupepe Kumba H, Liady A, K AD, et al. Surgical abdominal emergencies in disadvantaged area: epidemiologic and therapeutic aspects. J Med Res 1 oct. 2018;4:223–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Korsé BA, Lansana CF, Yaya DS, Habiboulaye B, Mamadou BT, Togba SL, et al. Problem of the care of digestive surgical emergencies at the visceral surgery department of Donka National Hospital in Conakry. Adv Surg Sci. 2021;9(1):1.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kotiso B, Abdurrahman Z. April. Pattern of acute abdomen in adults patients in Tikur Anbessa Teaching Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. East and Central African. J Surg. 2007;12(1).

  54. Madubogwu CI. Spectrum and outcome of acute abdomen in surgery department of a mission hospital. Orient J Med. 2020;32(1–2):10–7.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mbah N, Opara WEK, Agwu NP. Waiting time among acute abdominal emergencies in a Nigerian teaching hospital: causes of delay and consequences. Niger J Surg Res. 2006;8(1).

  56. McConkey SJ. Case series of acute abdominal surgery in rural Sierra Leone. World J Surg. 2002;26(4):509–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Melkie A, Alemayehu T, Tarekegn E. Pattern of acute abdomen in Dil Chora referral hospital, Eastern Ethiopia. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health. 2016;8(11):0–0.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Mjema KM, Sawe HR, Kulola I, Mohamed AS, Sylvanus E, Mfinanga JA et al. Aetiologies and outcomes of patients with abdominal pain presenting to an emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Tanzania: a prospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):173.

  59. Motto GRB, Ngoumfe JCC, Boukar YME, et al. Evaluate the delay in the management of acute abdomen at the Yaounde central hospital: a prospective cohort study. MOJ Clin Med Case Rep. 2021;11(6):155–8.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mpirimbanyi C, Abahuje E, Hirwa AD, Gasakure M, Rwagahirima E, Niyonzima C et al. Surgical emergencies referred from district hospitals to university teaching hospital of Kigali and the implications on surgical services in Rwanda: a retrospective study. East and Central African Journal of Surgery. 2020;25:18–25.

  61. Mpirimbanyi C, Nyirimodoka A, Lin Y, Hedt-Gauthier BL, Odhiambo J, Nkurunziza T, et al. Emergency general surgery in Rwandan district hospitals: a cross-sectional study of spectrum, management, and patient outcomes. BMC Surg. 2017;17(1):121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Nega B. Pattern of acute abdomen and variables associated with adverse outcome in a rural primary hospital setting. Ethiop Med J Janv. 2009;47(2):143–51.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Negash M. Assessment of non-traumatic acute abdominal cases treated operatively at Wolaita Sodo teaching and referral hospital, Southern Ethiopia. J Pharm Altern Med. 2017;14(0):25.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ngakani So O, Kfd A, Jm N, Fo. Prevalence of digestive surgical emergencies at the Amissa Bongo Regional Hospital in Franceville.

  65. Nyundo M, Rugwizangoga E, Ntakiyiruta G, Kakande I. Outcome of emergency abdominal surgery at Kigali university teaching hospital: a review of 229 cases. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2013;18(1):31–9.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Obonna GC, Arowolo OA, Agbakwuru EA, Etonyeaku AC. Emerging pattern of emergency abdominal surgeries in Ile-Ife Nigeria. Niger J Surg Sci. 2014;24(2):31.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ogbuanya AU, Emedike SOC. Abdominal surgical emergency in South Eastern Nigeria. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2016;7(4):10217–23.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ohene-Yeboah M. Acute surgical admissions for abdominal pain in adults in Kumasi, Ghana. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(10):898–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Paluku KJ, N’Tcha NHN, Attolou SGR, Mupepe KA, Lyadi AL, Kambusu TD, et al. Surgical abdominal emergencies in disadvantaged area: case of Savalou-Bantè health area hospital in Benin. Médecine Afr Noire. 2018;65(11):539–46.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Paluku Katswere Josaphat1, Désiré2 SK, René3 HN. Muhindo Valimungighe Moïse4, Kambasu Talimula Demaison. Problematique du retard de prise en charge des urgences chirurgicales abdominales non traumatiques au centre hospitalier bethesda; cotonou, benin Revue Médicale des Grands Lacs Vol11, N°1, Mars 2020.

  71. Rahman GA, Debrah SA, Andoh EA. Indications for emergency abdominal surgery in Cape Coast, Ghana. Int Surg J. 2018;5(6):2031–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sanogo S, Togola DTraoréB, Bengaly B, Coulibaly M, Ongoïba O, Samber M, Ouattara D, Coulibaly B. Ba Babou Diallo, N Ongoiba. Urgences chirurgicales digestives à l’hôpital régional De tombouctou/mali. J Afr Chir Digest. 2020;20(2):3097–100.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Smith MTD, Clarke DL. Spectrum and outcome of emergency general surgery laparotomies at a tertiary center in South Africa. J Surg Res. 2021;262:65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Songne B, Kanassoua KK, Dosseh ED, Ayité A. Urgences chirurgicales abdominales non traumatiques de l’adulte opérées à l’hôpital Saint Jean De Dieu d’Afagnan. J Afr Chir Digest. 2008;8:764–0.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Soumah SA, Ba PA, Diallo-Owono FK, Toure CT. Les abdomens aigus chirurgicaux en milieu africain: étude d’une série de 88 cas à l’hô-pital Saint Jean De Dieu De Thiès. Sénégal Surgical acute abdominal emergencies in an African area: study of 88 cases at Saint Jean De Dieu hospital in Thiès. Senegal Arch Surg. 2001;136(5):556–62.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Spence RT, Hampton M, Pluke K, Kahn M, Chinyepi N, Elmusbahi M, et al. Factors associated with adverse events after emergency laparotomy in Cape Town, South Africa: identifying opportunities for quality improvement. J Surg Res 1 déc. 2016;206(2):363–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Tamegnon D, Kouliwa KK, Tabana M, Iroukora K, Olivier AEG, Edem G et al. Digestive surgical emergencies in Kara teaching hospital (Togo). Archives of surgery and clinical case reports. 2021. Disponible sur: https://www.gavinpublishers.com/article/view/digestive-surgical-emergencies-in-kara-teaching-hospital-togo

  78. Tassew B, Haile M, Tefera T, Balda S, Gonfa K, Mubashir K. Presentation and outcome of acute abdomen in Goba referral hospital, Goba, Southeast Ethiopia: retrospective study. SM J Fam Med. 2017;1:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tendeng JN, Ndong A, Diao ML, Sagna A, Diedhiou M, Dieng M, Manyacka PM, Konate I. Management of digestive surgical emergencies: prospective study of 118 cases. J Afr Chir. 2018;5(2):92.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Tounkara I, Diarra A, Traore A, Karembe B, Diakite S, Keita K, et al. Digestive surgical emergencies at the commune II reference health centre in the district of Bamako. Surg Sci. 2022;13(5):258–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Tsegaye S, Osman M, Bekele A. Surgically treated acute abdomen at Gondar university hospital, Ethiopia. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2007;12(1):53–7.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Valimungighe M, Bunduki G, MN K, OL A. Aetiologies of non-traumatological abdominal surgery emergencies in butembo, democratic republic of Congo. 2015.

  83. Wossen M. Pattern of emergency surgical operations performed for non-traumatic acute abdomen at Ayder referral hospital, Mekelle University, Tigrai, Ethiopia. Open Access J Clin Trials. 2019;9:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Yawo KS, Naby F, Naby CS, Monece H, Togba SL, Biro D. Non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies at the Communal Medical Center (CMC) of Matam, Conakry. GSC Adv Res Rev. 2021;8(1):041–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Zare C, Belemlilga G, Binyom R, Diallo O, Yabre N, Keita N, Et Al. Les Abdomens Aigus Chirurgicaux Non Traumatiques Chez L’adulte Au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Souro Sanou (Chuss) De Bobo-Dioulasso: a Propos D’une Serie De 675 Cas. J Afr Chir Digest. 2020;20(2):3101–5.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Zaré C, Belemlilga H, Ouangre E, Zida M, Sanon BG, Barro D, et al. Epidemiological, etiological, therapeutic and evolutionary aspects of acute surgical abdomens operated at the university hospital of Bobo-Dioulasso. Surg Sci. 2018;9(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. The Lancet. 2015;26(10000):1278–87.

  88. Obsa MS, Adema BG, Shanka GM, Lake EA, Azeze GA, Fite RO. Prevalence of acute appendicitis among patient admitted for acute abdomen in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg Open. 2020;26:154–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Wickramasinghe DP, Xavier C, Samarasekera DN. The worldwide epidemiology of acute appendicitis: an analysis of the global health data exchange dataset. World J Surg. 2021;45(7):1999–2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Williams BM, Purcell LN, Varela C, Gallaher J, Charles A. Appendicitis mortality in a resource-limited setting: issues of access and failure to rescue. J Surg Res. 2021;259:320–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Markogiannakis H, Messaris E, Dardamanis D, Pararas N, Tzertzemelis D, Giannopoulos P, et al. Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: clinical presentation, etiology, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(3):432–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Ndong A, Diallo A, Tendeng J, Diao M, Niang F, Diop S, et al. Occlusions intestinales mécaniques de l’adulte: étude rétrospective de 239 cas à l’Hôpital Régional de Saint-Louis (Sénégal). 2020;20:3143–7.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Lorenz R, Oppong C, Frunder A, Lechner M, Sedgwick DM, Tasi A et al. Improving surgical education in East Africa with a standardized hernia training program. Hernia.

  94. Jn AN, Ac T, Ml D, O D, Sd S. M, Adult groin hernia surgery in sub-saharan Africa: a 20-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg. [cité 20 Nov 2022]; Disponible sur: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36066755/

  95. Doumgba DA, Nghario L, Ngaoutchougbo VN, Peguele OA, Kamoun NJ, Gaudeuille A, et al. Aspects diagnostiques et thérapeutiques des péritonites aiguës généralisées à Propos De 214 Cas à Bangui. Rev Afr Chir Spéc. 2015;9(3):18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Sogoba G, Katile D, Sangaré S, Traoré LI, Diakité L, Cissé SM et al. Présentation Clinique, Traitement et Évolution des Péritonites Aiguës Généralisées à l’Hôpital Fousseyni Daou De Kayes Au Mali. Health Sci Dis. 2021 [cité 14 Déc 2021];22(6). Disponible sur: https://www.hsd-fmsb.org/index.php/hsd/article/view/2770

  97. Choua O, Ali MM, Kaboro M, Moussa KM, Anour M. Aspects étiologiques, cliniques et thérapeutiques des péritonites aiguës généralisées à N’Djamena, Tchad. 2017;.

  98. Dieng M, Aï N, Ka O, Konate I, Dia A, Touré Ct. Aspects Etiologiques Et Therapeutiques Des Peritonites Aiguës Generalisees D’origine Digestive. Une Série De 207 Cas Opérés En Cinq Ans [Aetiology And Therapeutic Aspects Of Generalized Acute Peritonitis Of Digestive Origin. A Survey Of 207 Cases Operated In Five Years.]. Mali Méd. 2006;21(4):47.

  99. Ndong A, Sarr ISS, Gueye ML, Seye Y, Diallo AC, Thiam O, et al. Aspects diagnostiques et thérapeutiques des traumatismes abdominaux: À propos 68 cas. J Afr Chir Dig. 2018;18:2474–8.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Mnguni MN, Muckart DJJ, Madiba TE. Abdominal trauma in Durban, South Africa: factors influencing outcome. Int Surg. 2012;97(2):161–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Felizaire MR, Paradis T, Beckett A, Fata P, Grushka J, Johnson W, et al. Perioperative mortality rates as a health metric for acute abdominal surgery in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and future recommendations. World J Surg. 2019;43(8):1880–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Ouma PO, Maina J, Thuranira PN, Macharia PM, Alegana VA, English M, et al. Access to emergency hospital care provided by the public sector in sub-saharan Africa in 2015: a geocoded inventory and spatial analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(3):e342–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gaston Berger University, Saint-Louis, Senegal

    Abdourahmane Ndong, Lebem Togtoga, Mamadou Saïdou Bah, Papa Djibril Ndoye & Khadim Niang

  2. General Surgery Department, Regional Hospital Center of Saint Saint-Louis, Saint-Louis, Senegal

    Abdourahmane Ndong

Authors
  1. Abdourahmane Ndong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lebem Togtoga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mamadou Saïdou Bah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Papa Djibril Ndoye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Khadim Niang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AN and LT did the literature search and statistical analyses; AN, LT, SB and PDN wrote the main manuscript text and prepared figures and tables; KN corrected the manuscript text, figures and tables; All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdourahmane Ndong.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ndong, A., Togtoga, L., Bah, M.S. et al. Prevalence and mortality rate of abdominal surgical emergencies in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg 24, 35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02319-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02319-0

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us