Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Medium and long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine diseases

Study

Study design

Country

Study Period

Age (years)

Sex (M/F)

No. of treated segments

Type of fusion

Follow-up(months)

Dynesys

Fusion

Dynesys

Fusion

Dynesys

Fusion

Luo et al., 2022

Retro

China, Chongqing

2013–2017

62.8 ± 11.6

58.2 ± 12.2

11/23

9/22

NA

TLIF

44 (36—78)

39 (30—73)

Zheng et al., 2021

Retro

China, Beijing

2012–2017

67.67 ± 5.70

66.98 ± 6.11

16/24

15/24

2–3

PLIF

41.90 ± 9.89

43.68 ± 13.82

Zhang et al., 2021

Retro

China, Zhejiang

2010–2012

55.1 ± 14.6

52.6 ± 16.8

14/9

12/8

2

PLIF

78.0 ± 25.6 (60–120)

Hu et al., 2019

Retro

China, Shanghai

2011–2013

69.27 ± 4.92

69.41 ± 4.23

11/11

22/22

1–3

TLIF

68.50 ± 6.40

70.14 ± 7.26

Ren et al., 2018

Retro

China, Sichuan

2011–2015

49.5 ± 11.6

52.7 ± 12.4

27/11

31/13

1

TLIF

25.4 ± 4.0

24.8 ± 5.2

Kuo et al., 2018

Retro

China, Taiwan

2007–2014

60.1 ± 10.8

58.0 ± 11.7

21/35

8/15

1

TLIF

35.2 (24–89)

Wu et al., 2017

Pro

China, Zhejiang

2008–2010

49.6 ± 8.3

52.5 ± 6.9

14/12

18/22

2–4

PLIF

50.3 (46—65)

52.8 (48 – 68)

Liu et al., 2017

Pro

China, Beijing

2011–2013

52.9 ± 10.3

54.6 ± 9.9

26/29

29/29

1

PLIF + TLIF

24

Bredin et al., 2017

Retro

France, Marne

2005–2011

60.3 ± 9.4

61.3 ± 8.4

18/15

13/12

1–2

PLF

93.6 ± 16.5

91.7 ± 13.5

Zhang et al., 2016

Retro

China, Beijing

2008–2011

48.1 ± 12.3

52.3 ± 12.9

31/15

37/13

1–3

PLIF

53.6 ± 5.3

55.2 ± 6.8

He et al., 2016

Pro

China, Jiangsu

NA

58.3 ± 13.5

61.4 ± 15.2

7/5

9/15

1–2

PLIF

28.7 ± 5.3

30.1 ± 6.8

Wang et al., 2016

Retro

China, Liaoning

2009–2013

42.8 ± 6.7

56.8 ± 6.2

24/21

17/23

2–3

PLIF

30.6 ± 8.6

32.7 ± 7.9

Fei et al., 2015

Pro

China, Jiangsu

2007–2009

47.3 ± 12.9

52.9 ± 11.2

51/44

40/41

1–3

PLIF

36–66

Yang et al., 2014

Pro

China, Shanghai

2010–2012

55.96 ± 7.68

54.69 ± 3.26

17/13

21/24

1–2

PLIF

26.64 ± 5.16

26.04 ± 9.12

Silvestre et al., 2014

Retro

Italy, Bologna

2002–2005

68.4 (61–78)

67.6 (62–77)

7/25

5/20

NA

PLIF

64 (42–90)

Haddad et al., 2013

Retro

UK, London and Stanmore

2004–2006

40.6 ± 6.46

46.5 ± 10.7

19/13

15/17

NA

PLIF

48

Yu et al., 2012

RCT

China, Taiwan

2006–2007

52.22 ± 8.31

55.52 ± 6.98

10/17

11/18

1

PLIF

36

  1. RCT randomized controlled trial, Pro prospective clinical trial, Retro retrospective clinical trial, NOS Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, TLIF transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, PLIF posterior lumbar interbody fusion, PLF posterolateral fusion, NA not applicable