Table 3 Patient population with treatment via posterior approach (all treated with posterior stabilization C1/2 regarding Goel/Harms [5, 7]
n | Age | Gender | Diagnosis | Duration 3D Scan (s) | Dental implants | Image quality NAS | Malposition | Malposition correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 88 | m | And Type II Eysel/Roosen Type C | 257 | No | 10 | No | No |
2 | 69 | m | Pathologic fracture | 232 | Yes | 7 | C1 too cranial | Yes |
3 | 69 | m | And Type II Eysel/Roosen Type C | 301 | No | 8 | No | No |
4 | 79 | f | And Type II Eysel/Roosen Type C | 243 | No | 9 | C2 rightside too medial | Yes |
5 | 68 | f | Pseudarthrosis | 307 | No | 9 | No | No |
6 | 48 | f | Instability C1/2 | 255 | No | 8 | No | No |
7 | 87 | f | Unhappy triad | 246 | Yes | 8 | No | No |
8 | 59 | m | Instability C1/2 | 288 | Yes | 7 | No | No |
9 | 64 | m | And Type II Eysel/Roosen Type C | 255 | No | 8 | No | No |
10 | 71 | m | Pathologic fracture | 307 | No | 9 | No | No |
11 | 64 | m | Instability C1/2 | 289 | Yes | 7 | C2 leftside too medial | Yes |
12 | 55 | f | And Type II Eysel/Roosen Type C | 247 | Yes | 8 | No | No |
13 | 53 | m | And Type II Eysel/Roosen Type C | 255 | No | 8 | C2 too long | draw back wire |
14 | 77 | f | Pathologic fracture | 279 | Yes | 7 | C1 too long and too medial | Yes |
15 | 83 | m | Pseudarthrosis | 252 | Yes | 7 | No | draw back wire |
16 | 81 | f | C2 Arch fracture | 288 | Yes | 7 | No | No |
17 | 53 | f | And Type II Eysel/Roosen Type C | 271 | No | 9 | No | No |
18 | 78 | m | Pathologic fracture | 243 | No | 9 | No | No |
19 | 80 | f | And Type II Eysel/Roosen Type C | 281 | Yes | 8 | C1 not enough convergence | Yes |
20 | 25 | m | And Type II Eysel/Roosen Type C | 258 | No | 9 | No | No |
21 | 85 | f | And Type II Eysel/Roosen Type C | 277 | Yes | 8 | No | No |
22 | 71 | m | Pseudarthrosis | 244 | Yes | 7 | No | No |