Skip to main content

Table 2 Surgery-related variables and clinical outcomes

From: Medium-term clinical results in patients with floating hip injuries

Variables

Liebergall classification

p value

F/χ2

Type A

n (%)

Type B

n (%)

Type C

n (%)

Injury to femoral surgery time, days (range)

5.3 (2–8)

7.8 (3–11)

6.4 (1–10)

0.253

1.366

Hospital stay, days

15.9

16.4

17.1

0.419

0.639

Closed reduction of femoral fracture (%)

4 (26.65%)

2 (40%)

2 (25%)

0.82

0.397

Definitive femoral fixation

   

0.18

3.457

 Nail (%)

12 (80%)

3 (60%)

8 (100%)

  

 Locking plate (%)

3 (20%)

2 (40%)

0 (0%)

  

Definitive acetabular fixation

   

0.86

0.747

 Anterior approach (%)

2 (40%)

3 (37.5%)

  

 Posterior approach (%)

1 (20%)

1 (12.5%)

  

 Combined approaches (%)

2 (40%)

3 (37.5%)

  

 Total hip arthroplasty (%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

  

 Non-surgical treatment (%)

0 (0%)

1 (12.5%)

  

Definitive pelvic ring fixation

   

0.624

4.387

 Anterior ring only

0 (0%)

 

0 (0%)

  

  Symphyseal plate (%)

7 (46.7%)

2 (25%)

  

  INFIX (%)

3 (20%)

3 (37.5%)

  

  External fixator

1 (6.66%)

 

0 (0%)

  

 Posterior ring only

     

  Sacroiliac screw (%)

1 (6.66%)

0 (0%)

  

 Anterior and posterior rings

 

   

  INFIX + sacroiliac screw (%)

2 (13.3%)

1 (12.5%)

  

  External fixator + sacroiliac screw (%)

0 (0%)

1 (12.5%)

  

  Symphyseal plate + sacroiliac screw (%)

1 (6.66%)

 

1 (12.5%)

  

Quality of reduction

     

 Pelvic ring [15]

   

0.579

1.969

  Excellent (%)

11 (73.3%)

5 (62.5%)

  

  Good (%)

2 (13.3%)

1 (12.5%)

  

  Fair (%)

1 (6.7%)

0 (0%)

  

  Poor (%)

1 (6.7%)

2 (25%)

  

 Acetabulum [9]

   

0.940

0.124

  Anatomical (%)

3 (60%)

4 (50%)

  

  Imperfect (%)

1 (20%)

2 (25%)

  

  Poor (%)

1 (20%)

2 (25%)

  

Assessment of hip function [16]

   

0.513

2.297

 Excellent (%)

2 (40%)

3 (37.5%)

  

 Good (%)

1 (20%)

2 (25%)

  

 Fair (%)

0 (0%)

2 (25%)

  

 Poor (%)

2 (40%)

1 (12.5%)

  

Total

15(53.6%)

5(17.8%)

8(28.6%)

  
  1. Categorical variables were analyzed by Pearson’s Chi square test. Regression analysis was used for continuous variables