Table 2 The results of the plastic surgeons’ aesthetic evaluation of our patients
|  | Surgeon 1 evaluation (number of cases for each score 1–5) | Surgeon 2 evaluation (number of cases for each score 1–5) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Size of new earlobe | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (13.3%) | 6 (20%) | 20 (66.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (20%) | 24 (80%) |
Shape of new earlobe | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (6.7%) | 3 (10%) | 25 (83.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.3%) | 3 (10%) | 26 (86.7%) |
Scar quality | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (20%) | 9 (30%) | 15 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (16.7%) | 7 (23.3%) | 18 (60%) |
Overall appearance of new earlobe | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (6.7%) | 5 (16.7%) | 23 (76.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (6.7%) | 5 (16.7%) | 23 (76.7%) |
Mean surgeon aesthetic evaluation score | 4.7 ± 0.4 | |||||||||