Skip to main content

Table 3 Patient outcome

From: Management of intra-thoracic anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic vacuum therapy versus stenting

Year

Author

Initial treatment method

Patients (n)

Median Number of stents/ sponges (range)

Median days treatment duration (range)

Successful closure rate (n)

Treatment related complications (n)

Majpr complications (n)

Esophago- tracheal fistula (n)

Surgical revision (n)

Stricture (n)

Time on ICU days

Median hospitalization in days (range)

In hospital mortality (n)

2013

Brangewitz

EVT

32

7 (5–28)

23 (9–86)

27

8

3

1

1

3

-

48.5 (21–122) (mean und range)

5

  

SEMS

39

3 (2–6)

33 (9–132)

21

8

6

0

3

11

-

41 (2–93) (mean und range)

11

2013

Schniewind

EVT

17

0

26 ± 19 (mean + SD)

57 ± 30 (mean und SD)

2

  

SEMS

12

2

38 ± 32 (mean + SD)

62 ± 39 (mean + SD)

5

2015

Mennigen

EVT

15

6.5 (1–18)

26,5 (3–75)

14

0

0

0

0

58 (23–106)

1

  

SEMS

30

1 (1–6)

36 (1–156)

19

1

3

1

4

53 (13–195)

8

2016

Hwang

EVT

7

4.3 (2–10)

27 (2–84)

7

0

0

0

37.1 (13–128)

  

SEMS

11

1.6 (1–4)

19.5 (5–21)

7

6

5

3

87.3 (17–366)

2018

Berlth

EVT

34

3 (1–9)

12 (3–58)

24

4

0

0

1

Median 6 (0–60)

37 (19–118)

3

  

SEMS

77

1 (1–3)

27 (1–152)

49

18

4

0

5

Median 9 (0–295)

38 (13–296)

11

2021

Eichelmann

EVT

30

6 (1–25)

23 (3–101)

28

1

Median 18 (4–107)

47 (14–119)

5

  

SEMS

14

1 (1–3)

44 (11–68)

13

5

Median 18 (8–38)

34 (17–56)

1

2021

El Sourani

EVT

13

5 (4–18)

24.5 (8–80

12

0

4

5

Median 38 (9–193)

74 (9–193)

5

  

SEMS

7

1 (1–2)

22 (3–31)

6

2

2

1

Median 20 (16–57)

41 (22–123)

1