Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of ten patients’ clinical materials

From: Ileal ureteral replacement for the management of ureteral avulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a case series

No.

Age

Gender

BMI (kg/m2)

From avulsion to IUR

Side of pathology

Surgical approach

Location of UA

The length of UA (cm)

The length of ileum (cm)

OT (min)

EBL (mL)

Liquid diet, days

Ambulation, days

Post-OPH, days

Post-OPC (C–D grade)

Follow-up (months)

1

52

Male

25.4

3 months

Left

Open

Lower

20

20

320

250

9

2

14

II (incomplete intestinal obstruction)

131

2

50

Female

22.3

12 months

Left

Open

Lower

22

22

360

100

7

3

12

None

124

3

46

Male

26.5

6 months

Left

Open

Upper

25

25

372

1000

6

3

13

None

92

4

61

Female

23.9

Immediate

Right

Open

Upper

17

25

530

100

6

3

19

None

74

5

36

Female

19.4

6 months

Left

LS

Lower

25

25

273

200

3

1

10

None

31

6

74

Male

21.3

6 months

Right

RA

Upper

12

12

238

20

4

1

11

None

16

7

39

Male

26.1

24 months

Left

RA

Middle

10

20

283

50

3

1

7

None

14

8

56

Female

18.9

5 months

Left

RA

Lower

20

20

191

10

5

1

11

None

10

9

36

Male

24.5

3 months

Right

LS

Upper

20

20

330

100

5

2

10

None

9

10

49

Female

27.9

6 months

Left

RA

Lower

20

20

201

100

3

1

18

II (incomplete intestinal obstruction)

5

Average, range

50 (36–74)

5 males; 5 females

23.6 (18.9–27.9)

3 right; 7 left

 

19 (10–25)

21 (12–25)

310 (191–530)

193 (10–1000)

5 (3–9)

2 (1–3)

13 (7–19)

51 (5–131)

  1. BMI body mass index, C–D grade Clavien–Dindo grade, EBL estimated blood loss, IUR ileal ureteral replacement, LS laparoscopy, OPC operative complications, OPH operative hospitalization, OT operative time, RA robotic-assisted, UA ureteral avulsion