Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis of predictive factors for recurrence of CSDH

From: Hematoma cavity separation and neomembrane thickness are potential triggers of recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma

 

p value

OR (95% CI)

Model 1

  

 Gender

0.998

NA

 Age (years)

0.362

0.949 (0.847–1.063)

 Hypertension

0.085

0.060 (0.002–1.474)

 Diabetes

0.514

0.419 (0.031–5.718)

 Antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant use

0.101

14.836 (0.590-372.953)

 Bilateral hematoma

0.998

NA

 History of trauma

0.861

0.839 (0.117–6.008)

 Mild brain atrophy

0.320

1

 Moderate brain atrophy

0.131

10.816 (0.491-238.388)

 Severe brain atrophy

0.999

NA

 Hematoma thickness

0.313

2.885 (0.368–22.592)

 Midline shift

0.809

0.748 (0.071–7.850)

 Neomembrane in CT*

0.019

56.135 (1.916-1644.653)

Model 2

  

 Gender

0.998

NA

 Age (years)

0.551

0.963 (0.851–1.090)

Hypertension

0.162

0.109 (0.005–2.441)

 Diabetes

0.572

0.488 (0.040–5.905)

 Antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant use

0.099

14.848 (0.603-347.929)

 History of trauma

0.891

0.872 (0.125–6.088)

 Bilateral hematoma

0.998

NA

 Mild brain atrophy

0.528

1

 Moderate brain atrophy

0.259

6.586 (0.250-173.249)

 Severe brain atrophy

0.999

NA

 Hematoma thickness

0.347

2.715 (0.339–21.774)

 Midline shift

0.586

0.498 (0.040–6.125)

 Hematoma cavity separation in CT*

0.019

40.173 (1.833-880.678)

Model 3

  

 Gender

0.997

NA

 Age (years)

0.266

0.914 (0.780–1.071)

Hypertension

0.161

0.114 (0.005–2.373)

Diabetes

0.797

1.409 (0.104–19.141)

Antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant use

0.869

1.285 (0.065–25.561)

Bilateral hematoma

0.998

NA

History of trauma

0.451

2.376 (0.251–22.522)

Mild brain atrophy

0.794

1

Moderate brain atrophy

0.498

3.968 (0.074-212.904)

Severe brain atrophy

0.999

NA

Hematoma thickness

0.704

1.593 (0.144–17.632)

Midline shift

0.446

0.287 (0.012–7.131)

Hematoma cavity separation or*

Neomembrane during endoscopy

0.008

45.822 (2.666-787.711)

  1.  Results were derived from logistic models. Model 1, Model 2 and Model 3 were adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant use, bilateral hematoma, brain atrophy, hematoma thickness and midline shift, history of trauma
  2. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NA not available, CSDH chronic subdural hematoma, CT computed tomography
  3. *Significant difference