Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of patients who received lymphadenectomy for lymph node recurrence

From: The impact of lymphadenectomy on lymph node recurrence after performing various treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

 

Esophagectomy (n = 11)

ER (n = 5)

CRT/CT (n = 4)

Total (n = 20)

Age, median (range)

64 (56–84)

73(65–81)

65(56–73)

67(56–84)

Sex (%)

    

 Male

10 (90.9)

4 (80.0)

3 (75.0)

17 (85.0)

 Female

1(9.1)

1 (20.0)

1 (25.0)

3 (15.0)

Location, Ce/Ut/Mt/Lt

    

 Ce

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (25.0)

1 (5.0)

 Ut

0 (0)

1 (20.0)

0 (0)

1 (5.0)

 Mt

9 (81.8)

3 (60.0)

2(50.0)

14 (70.0)

 Lt

2 (18.2)

1 (20.0)

1 (25.0)

4 (20.0)

Stage (%)

    

 I

2 (18.2)

5 (100)

0 (0)

7 (35.0)

 II

2 (18.2)

0 (0)

1 (25.0)

3 (15.0)

 III

4 (36.4)

0 (0)

0 (0)

4 (20.0)

 IVA

2 (18.2)

0 (0)

1 (25.0)

3 (15.0)

 IVB

1 (9.1)

0 (0)

2 (50.0)

3 (15.0)

Initial lymphadenectomy range

    

 Three-field

9 (81.8)

NA

NA

NA

 The others

2 (18.2)

NA

NA

NA

 pR0

10 (90.9)

5 (100)

NA

NA

 Adjuvant therapy

4 (36.4)

0(0)

NA

NA

RFS, month, median (range)

13.4 (3.3–68.4)

50.5 (12.1–61.8)

19.9 (6.5–28.7)

15.9 (3.3–68.4)

Site of recurrence

    

 Cervical

9 (81.8)

3 (60.0)

1 (25.0)

13 (65.0)

 Mediastinal

1 (9.1)

2 (40.0)

2 (50.0)

5 (25.0)

 Abdominal

1 (9.1)

0 (0)

1 (25.0)

2 (10.0)

Approach of lymphadenectomy for recurrence

    

 Open

11

4

3

18

 Mediastinoscopic

0

1

1

2

  1. ER endoscopic resection, CT chemotherapy, CRT chemoradiotherapy, pR pathological residual tumor, NA not applicable, RFS relapse-free survival, Ce Cervical esophagus, Ut Upper thoracic esophagus, Mt Middle thoracic esophagus, Lt Lower thoracic esophagus
  2. The stages of esophagectomy and ER are pathological. The stage of CRT/CT is clinical