Table 1 Comparison and analysis of general data of the two groups
Cabbage type (n = 89) | Reverse procedure type (n = 106) | P (value) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 60.26 ± 9.50* | 62.45 ± 9.27* | 0.105b |
Sex (%) | 0.126a | ||
Male | 63 (70.8) | 85 (80.2) | |
Female | 26 (29.2) | 21 (19.8) | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 20.53 ± 3.49* | 22.40 ± 2.92* | < 0.001b |
Tumour size (cm) | 5.12 ± 2.18* | 5.41 ± 2.97* | 0.448b |
Tumour sites (%) | 0.933a | ||
Cardia | 31 (34.8) | 39 (36.8) | |
Gastric fundus | 12 (13.5) | 12 (11.3) | |
Gastric body | 36 (40.4) | 45 (42.5) | |
Gastric antrum | 10 (11.2) | 10 (9.4) | |
Pathological differentiation (%) | |||
High differentiation | 1 (1.1) | 1 (0.9) | > 0.99a |
Middle differentiation | 31 (34.8) | 36 (34.0) | 0.90a |
Middle-low differentiation | 15 (16.9) | 20 (18.9) | 0.715a |
Low differentiation | 42 (47.2) | 49 (46.2) | 0.893a |