Skip to main content

Table 2 Percentages of hernia repair procedures according to recorded procedures in total compared by age group separately by sexes

From: Inguinal hernia repair in inpatient children: a nationwide analysis of German administrative data

Type of procedure

Sex

Age group

Mean (95% CI)

Omnibus test

Groupwise comparison

Open hernia repair

M

 < 1

98.8% (98.4–99.1)

Χ2 = 20.508

df = 3

P = 0.0001

 < 1 vs. 1–4: P = 0.5781

 < 1 vs. 5–9: P = 0.0727

1–4

98.8% (98.4–99.2)

 < 1 vs. 10–14: P = 0.0001

1–4 vs. 5–9: P = 0.025

5–9

98.1% (97.4–98.7)

1–4 vs. 10–14: P < 0.0001

10–14

97% (96.2–97.6)

5–9 vs. 10–14: P = 0.0214

F

 < 1

97.7% (97.2–98.2)

Χ2 = 23.199

df = 3

P < 0.0001

 < 1 vs. 1–4: P = 0.001

 < 1 vs.: 5–9: P < 0.0001

1–4

91.4% (88.8–93.8)

 < 1 vs. 10–14: P < 0.0001

1–4 vs. 5–9: P = 0.288

5–9

88.8% (85–92.4)

1–4 vs. 10–14: P = 0.045

10–14

86.3% (82.9–89.4)

5–9 vs. 10–14: P = 0.288

Laparoscopic hernia repair

M

 < 1

1.2% (0.9–1.6)

Χ2 = 21.114

df = 3

P < 0.0001

 < 1 vs. 1–4: P = 0.589

 < 1 vs.: 5–9: P = 0.074

1–4

1.2% (0.8–1.6)

 < 1 vs. 10–14: P < 0.0001

1–4 vs. 5–9: P = 0.027

5–9

1.9% (1.3–2.6)

1–4 vs. 10–14: P < 0.0001

10–14

2.9% (2.4–3.6)

5–9 vs. 10–14: P = 0.014

F

 < 1

2.3% (1.8–2.8)

Χ2 = 23.199

df = 3

P < 0.0001

 < 1 vs. 1–4: P = 0.001

 < 1 vs.: 5–9: P < 0.0001

1–4

8.6% (6.2–11.2)

 < 1 vs. 10–14: P < 0.0001

1–4 vs. 5–9: P = 0.288

5–9

11.2% (7.6–15)

1–4 vs. 10–14: P = 0.045

10–14

13.7% (10.6–17.1)

5–9 vs. 10–14: P = 0.288

Open herniorraphy

M

 < 1

78.5% (77.9–79)

Χ2 = 32.247

df = 3

P < 0.0001

 < 1 vs. 1–4: P = 0.0051

1–4

81% (80–82.2)

 < 1 vs. 5–9: P = 0.0254

5–9

80.3% (78.7–82)

1–4 vs. 5–9: 0.4867

10–14

67.9% (65–70.4)

Other comparisons: P < 0.0001

F

 < 1

69.9% (69–70.9)

Χ2 = 28.269

df = 3

P < 0.0001

 < 1 vs. 1–4: P = 0.84

1–4

69.8% (68.7–70.9)

 < 1 vs. 5–9: P = 0.84

5–9

69.6% (67.8–71.3)

1–4 vs. 5–9: P = 0.84

10–14

50.4% (47.2–53.8)

Other comparisons: P < 0.0001

Open hernioplasty

M

 < 1

21.1% (20.5–21.7)

Χ2 = 32.246

df = 3

P < 0.0001

 < 1 vs. 1–4: P = 0.0071

1–4

18.6% (17.3–19.7)

 < 1 vs. 5–9: P = 0.0147

5–9

19% (17.3–20.7)

1–4 vs. 5–9: 0.7215

10–14

30.2% (27.8–33)

Other comparisons: P < 0.0001

F

 < 1

29.9% (28.8–30.8)

Χ2 = 27.765

df = 3

P < 0.0001

 < 1 vs. 1–4: P = 0.79

1–4

30.1% (28.8–31.1)

 < 1 vs. 5–9: P = 0.79

5–9

29.7% (27.8–31.7)

1–4 vs. 5–9: 0.74

10–14

48% (43.7–52)

Other comparisons: P < 0.0001

Recurrent hernia

M

 < 1

0.6% (0.5–0.7)

Χ2 = 24.698

df = 3

P < 0.0001

 < 1 vs. 1–4: P = 0.022

 < 1 vs. 5–9: P < 0.0001

1–4

1.6% (1.3–1.9)

 < 1 vs. 10–14: P < 0.0001

1–4 vs. 5–9: P = 0.022

5–9

2.5% (2–3)

1–4 vs. 10–14: P = 0.001

10–14

3.1% (2.4–3.7)

5–9 vs. 10–14: P = 0.225

F

 < 1

0.3% (0.2–0.4)

Χ2 = 37.525

df = 3

P < 0.0001

1–4 vs. 5–9: P = 0.0865

1–4

1% (0.8–1.2)

5–9 vs. 10–14: P = 0.0001

5–9

1.3% (1.1–1.6)

Other comparisons: P < 0.0001

10–14

2.6% (2–3.2)

  1. Confidence intervals were obtained via bias-corrected, accelerated bootstrap with 10,000 repetitions. The different age groups among the types of hernias were compared by van der Waerden’s test as the omnibus-test followed by groupwise comparisons via the Conover-Iman test with correction for multiple comparisons using the method of Benjamini-Hochberg
  2. M male, F female, CI confidence interval