Skip to main content

Table 4 Separate results of included study groups

From: Damage control strategy in perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis

Variable

SG 1

SG 2

SG 3

SG 4

SG 5

Multiple publication

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

2010

2016

2012

2018

2018

Population

Perforated diverticulitis of the left colon with generalized peritonitis

Perforated diverticulitis of the left colon with generalized peritonitis

Perforated diverticulitis of the left colon with generalized peritonitis

Perforated diverticulitis of the left colon with generalized peritonitis

Perforated diverticulitis of the left colon with generalized peritonitis

Intervention

DCS

DCS

ABTheraTM

DCS

DCS

Comparator

2010: PRA, HP

2012: no

2016: PRA, HP

2018: No

2018:No

SuprasorbVR

No

No

Main outcome

2010: not specified

2016: Not specified

Not specified

Comment

Comparision of different systems for vacuum therapy in DCS patients

Mortality,

Morbidity,

Rate of intestinal anastomoses at 2nd look surgery

Not specified

2012: not specified

2018: Stoma rate at discharge

 

2018: Prognostic impact of ongoing peritonitis at 2nd look surgery

Design

POS

RS

RS

RS

RS

Follow-up

Length not specified

Length not specified

No

47 month (mean)

No

n

51

74

67

34

30

ASA > 2, n (%)

51 (100)

58 (78)

48 (72)

22 (65)

30 (100)

Age

69 (28–87) (median)

67 (30–92) (median)

67 (43–86) (median)

66.9 (mean)

68.5 (35–84) (median)

Female:male (%)

55:45

54:46

78:22

56:44

60:40

Sepsis/septic shock, n (%)

16 (31)

16 (22)

34 (51)

34 (100)

8 (27)

Hinchey III, n (%)

40 (78)

60 (81)

41 (61)

13 (38)

17 (57)

Hinchey IV, n (%)

11 (22)

14 (19)

18 (27)

21 (62)

13 (43)

MPI median

26 (12–39)

22.4 (6–42)

22 (0–39)

25.12

26.2 (12–40)

MPI ≥ 26, n (%)

32 (63)

29 (39)

24 (36)

23 (68)

18 (60)

Colorectal anastomosis at 2nd look operation, n (%)

38 of 50 (74)

62 (84)

37 of 65 (57)

24 (71)

24 (80)

Diverting Ileostomy at 2nd look, n (%)

4 of 50 (8)

25 (34)

6 of 65 (9)

3 (9)

0 (0)

End colostomy at 2nd look, n (%)

12 of 50 (24)

12 (16)

28 of 65 (43)

10 (29)

6 (20)

Peritonitis remission at 2nd look, n (%)

28 of 50 (56)

41 (55)

46 of 65 (71)

27 (79)

24 (80)

Fascia closure at 2nd look, n (%)

50 of 50 (100)

74 (100)

46 of 65 (71)

34 (100)

30 (100)

Surgical Morbidity, n (%)

19 (37)

26 (35)

14 (21)

14 (41)

7 (23)

Anastomotic leak (AL), n (%)

5 of 38 (13)

8 of 62 (13)

9 of 37 (24)

1 of 24 (4)

1 of 24 (4)

Revision laparotomy, n (%)

4 (8)

11 (15)*

19 (28)

3 (9)

0 (0)

Fascia dehisience, n (%)

1 of 50 (2)

5 (7)

5 of 65 (7)

2 (6)

0 (0)

Mortality (30 d), n (%)

5 (10)

5 (7)

9 (13)

4 (12)

1 (3)

Stomarate at discharge, n (%)

16 of 50 (32)

43 (58)

34 of 65 (52)

14 (41)**

6 (20)

  1. SG 1: Perathoner/Kafka-Ritsch et al., University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria; SG 2: Sohn et al., DCS Study Group Munich/Berlin, Germany; SG 3: Gasser et al., University Hospitals Innsbruck/Salzburg, Austria; SG 4: Tartaglia et al., New Santa Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, Italy; SG 5: Brillantino et al., “A Cardarelli” Hospital, Naples, Italy
  2. HP  Hartmann’s procedure, PRA  primary anastomosis, RS retrospective, POS  prospective observational study, DCS  damage control surgery
  3. *At revision laparotomy three patients received additional loop ileostomy and three other patients received end colostomy for anastomotic complication
  4. **At revision laparotomy, one patient received end colostomy