Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics (n = 144)

From: Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?

Parameter

ME + LLD (n = 72)

ME (n = 72)

p-value

Age

66 (36–83)

67.5 (34–90)

0.246

Sex (male/female)

  

< 0.001

 Male

50 (69.4%)

21 (29.1%)

 

 Female

22 (30.6%)

51 (70.9%)

 

Body mass index

23.0 (16.5–34.0)

22.3 (16.6–32.7)

0.334

ASA

  

0.244

 1–2

63 (87.5%)

68 (94.4%)

 

 3–4

9 (12.5%)

4 (5.6%)

 

Serum CEA (ng/ml)

4.3 (0.5–159.8)

3.6 (0.5–65.8)

0.132

Location

  

0.557

 Mid rectum

15 (20.8%)

19 (26.4%)

 

 Low rectum

57 (79.2%)

53 (73.6%)

 

pT

  

0.237

 1–3

38 (52.7%)

46 (63.8%)

 

 4

34 (47.3%)

26 (36.2%)

 

pN

  

1.000

 Negative

30 (41.6%)

29 (40.2%)

 

 Positive

42 (58.4%)

43 (59.8%)

 

pStage

  

1.000

 II

30 (41.6%)

29 (40.2%)

 

 III

42 (58.4%)

43 (59.8%)

 

pLLNM

10 (13.8%)

Neo-CRT

5 (6.9%)

0

0.058

Histological type

  

1.000

 Tubular adenocarcinoma

67 (93.0%)

66 (91.6%)

 

 Other histological type

5 (7.0%)

6 (8.4%)

 

Tumor diameter (mm)

50.0 (15–120)

45.0 (3–95)

0.293

Adjuvant CTx

35 (48.6%)

31 (43.0%)

0.616

  1. Continuous variables are presented as medians with ranges. Discrete variables are presented as numbers and percentages
  2. ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, Mid mid rectum, Low low rectum, LLNM lateral lymph node metastasis, CRT chemoradiation therapy, CTx chemotherapy