Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of quality-of-life parameters between the group undergoing trans-oral endoscopic thyroidectomy and the group undergoing conventional open thyroidectomy. This table is based on the specific thyroid surgery-related QOL questionnaire

From: Comparison of quality of life between patients undergoing trans-oral endoscopic thyroid surgery and conventional open surgery

Specific thyroid surgery-related QOL parameter and grade

Postoperative 2 weeks

Postoperative 6 weeks

Postoperative 12 weeks

Trans-oral endoscopic thyroidectomy

Open thyroidectomy

P value

Trans-oral endoscopic thyroidectomy

Open thyroidectomy

P value

Trans-oral endoscopic thyroidectomy

Open thyroidectomy

P value

Numbness N (%): 0

10 (31.3)

25 (65.8)

0.053

15 (46.9)

26 (68.4)

0.398

18 (56.3)

25 (69.4)

0.819

1

12 (37.5)

6 (15.8)

11 (34.4)

5 (13.2)

9 (28.1)

7 (19.4)

2

5 (15.6)

2 (5.3)

1 (3.1)

4 (10.5)

2 (6.3)

2 (5.6)

3

5 (15.6)

5 (13.2)

5 (15.6)

3 (7.9)

3 (9.4)

2 (5.6)

Tingling N (%): 0

20 (62.5)

12 (31.6)

0.060

19 (59.4)

13 (34.2)

0.052

22 (68.8)

13 (36.1)

0.009*

1

7 (21.9)

15 (39.5)

10 (31.3)

13 (34.2)

9 (28.1)

15 (41.7)

2

3 (9.4)

8 (21.1)

1 (3.1)

9 (23.7)

0 (0.0)

4 (11.1)

3

2 (6.3)

3 (7.9)

2 (6.3)

3 (7.9)

1 (3.1)

4 (11.1)

Cosmetic N (%): 4

28 (87.5)

10 (26.3)

< 0.001*

24 (75.0)

10 (26.3)

< 0.001*

30 (93.8)

12 (33.3)

< 0.001*

3

3 (9.4)

7 (18.4)

6 (18.8)

10 (26.3)

1 (3.1)

12 (33.3)

2

1 (3.1)

14 (36.8)

1 (3.1)

15 (39.5)

0 (0.0)

8 (22.2)

1

0 (0.0)

7 (18.4)

0 (0.0)

3 (7.9)

0 (0.0)

2 (5.6)

0

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (3.1)

0 (0.0)

1 (3.1)

2 (5.6)

Voice impairment N (%): 0

24 (75.0)

20 (52.6)

0.404

26 (81.3)

19 (50.0)

0.063

29 (90.6)

26 (72.2)

0.269

1

0 (0.0)

3 (7.9)

1 (3.1)

3 (7.9)

1 (3.1)

5 (13.9)

2

1 (3.1)

2 (5.3)

2 (6.3)

10 (26.3)

1 (3.1)

4 (11.1)

3

1 (3.1)

5 (13.2)

1 (3.1)

4 (10.5)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

4

6 (18.8)

8 (21.1)

2 (6.3)

2 (5.3)

1 (3.1)

1 (2.8)

Swallowing impairment N (%): 0

19 (59.4)

18 (47.4)

0.281

24 (75.0)

19 (50.0)

0.036*

27 (84.4)

26 (72.2)

0.508

1

4 (12.5)

0 (0.0)

2 (6.3)

3 (7.9)

2 (6.3)

2 (5.6)

2

4 (12.5)

9 (23.7)

5 (15.6)

6 (15.8)

3 (9.4)

4 (11.1)

3

3 (9.4)

1 (2.6)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.6)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.8)

4

2 (6.3)

10 (26.3)

1 (3.1)

9 (23.7)

0 (0.0)

3 (8.3)

Neck movement impairment N (%): 0

6 (18.8)

10 (26.3)

> 0.999

12 (37.5)

15 (39.5)

> 0.999

21 (65.6)

18 (50.0)

0.622

1

6 (18.8)

3 (7.9)

10 (31.3)

5 (13.2)

5 (15.6)

8 (22.2)

2

8 (25.0)

9 (23.7)

5 (15.6)

8 (21.1)

3 (9.4)

6 (16.7)

3

3 (9.4)

4 (10.5)

1 (3.1)

3 (7.9)

2 (6.3)

0 (0.0)

4

9 (28.1)

12 (31.6)

4 (12.5)

7 (18.4)

1 (3.1)

4 (11.1)

Shoulder movement impairment N (%): 0

30 (93.8)

36 (94.7)

> 0.999

30 (93.8)

33 (86.8)

> 0.999

32 (100.0)

34 (94.4)

NA

1

2 (6.3)

0 (0.0)

1 (3.1)

3 (7.9)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.8)

2

0 (0.0)

1 (2.6)

1 (3.1)

2 (5.3)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

3

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

4

0 (0.0)

1 (2.6)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.8)

Physical activity reduction N (%): 0

22 (68.8)

11 (29.0)

0.001*

27 (84.4)

26 (68.4)

0.303

29 (90.6)

29 (80.6)

0.620

1

3 (9.4)

1 (2.6)

3 (9.4)

4 (10.5)

3 (9.4)

3 (8.3)

2

2 (6.3)

10 (26.3)

1 (3.1)

4 (10.5)

0 (0.0)

2 (5.6)

3

3 (9.4)

3 (7.9)

1 (3.1)

3 (7.9)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.8)

4

2 (6.3)

13 (34.2)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.6)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.8)

Psychosocial impairment N (%): 0

28 (87.5)

17 (44.7)

< 0.001*

29 (90.6)

25 (65.8)

0.028*

32 (100.0)

28 (77.8)

NA

1

3 (9.4)

4 (10.5)

3 (9.4)

4 (10.5)

0 (0.0)

2 (5.6)

2

0 (0.0)

3 (7.9)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.6)

0 (0.0)

2 (5.6)

3

1 (3.1

1 (2.6)

0 (0.0)

2 (5.3)

0 (0.0)

3 (8.3)

4

0 (0.00)

13 (34.2)

0 (0.0)

6 (15.8)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.8)

VAS Pain score (0–10)

Mean (SD)

1.6 (2.0)

1.6 (2.3)

> 0.999

0.6 (1.5)

1.3 (1.9)

0.298

0.3 (1.0)

0.6 (1.5)

> 0.999

Overall satisfaction (10–0)

Mean (SD)

8.9 (1.3)

7.3 (2.2)

< 0.001*

9.4 (0.7)

8.1 (1.8)

0.001*

9.8 (0.4)

8.9 (1.7)

0.022*

  1. * p < 0.05: statistically significance