Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Comparisons of perventricular device closure, conventional surgical repair, and transcatheter device closure in patients with perimembranous ventricular septal defects: a network meta-analysis

Study

Region

Design

Study quality*

Anatomy (percentage of pmVSD, %)

Manufacturer of device

Device size (mm) †

Inclusion criteria

Group

Age (yr) †

Weight (kg) †

Defect size (mm) †

PDC vs. CSR

Chen 2013 [24]

China

PCS

2b, 18

100

SHSMA

8.8 ± 1.8

Isolated pmVSD, 5–12 mm in size

PDC

13.3 ± 11.9

34.2 ± 16.8

7.6 ± 1.6

CSR

13.7 ± 13.5

34.6 ± 18.5

Hu 2014 [25]

China

PCS

2b, 20

100

SHSMA

8.4 ± 2.1

Isolated pmVSD ≤10 mm, no more than mild AR

PDC

3.7 ± 2.3

16.7 ± 7.5

7.0 ± 2.0

CSR

1.4 ± 0.6

15.6 ± 5.0

6.8 ± 2.1

Hu 2015 [26]

China

RCS

2b, 17

100

Lifetech Med

7.6 ± 2.0

Isolated pmVSD ≤10 mm, no AR

PDC

5.3 ± 3.6

18.1 ± 10.4

5.1 ± 2.2

CSR

4.4 ± 3.0

16.4 ± 6.1

4.2 ± 1.8

Luo 2015 [27]

China

RCS

2b, 17

100

SHSMA

NA

Isolated pmVSD, no severe PAH

PDC

3.7 ± 5.5

14.9 ± 13.0

4.5 ± 1.6

CSR

3.7 ± 2.4

15.9 ± 5.3

4.6 ± 2.4

Voitov 2017 [28]

Russia

RCT

1b, 22

81.9

SHSMA

4–11

Isolated VSD ≤10 mm, no more than mild AR

PDC

2.9 ± 0.4

13.9 ± 1.2

5.3 ± 0.3

CSR

3 ± 0.4

14.5 ± 1.2

6.2 ± 0.5

Xing 2015 [29]

China

RCS

2b, 19

86.9

AGA, SHSMA and Lifetech Med

6.5 ± 5.3

Restrictive isolated VSD, no severe PAH

PDC

1 ± 0.6

9.8 ± 5.9

5.2 ± 3.0

CSR

0.9 ± 0.7

8.6 ± 7.8

6.8 ± 3.8

Xu 2012 [30]

China

PCS

2b, 19

100

SHSMA

4–18

Isolated pmVSD, 3–12 mm, no more than mild AR, age < 2 years

PDC

0.7 ± 0.3

9.8 ± 1.8

5.1 ± 1.5

CSR

0.5 ± 0.2

7.7 ± 1.9

6.4 ± 1.7

Yao 2013 [31]

China

RCS

2b, 12

70.9

SHSMA

NA

Isolated VSD, no more than severe PAH

PDC

4.7 ± 0.4

18.4 ± 1.0

NA

CSR

4.6 ± 0.5

17.7 ± 1.2

NA

Liu 2018 [32]

China

RCT

1b, 26

100

Lifetech Med

8.9 ± 1.4

isolated pmVSD with 3 to 10 mm, normal or mild PAH

PDC

2 ± 0.7

13.2 ± 1.9

5.5 ± 1.4

CSR

2 ± 0.7

13.2 ± 1.9

5.5 ± 1.4

Chen 2018 [33]

China

RCS

2b, 17

100

Lifetech Med and Shandong Visee

6–14

pmVSD< 10, with no AR

PDC

1.3 ± 1.2

8.3 ± 2.6

4.2 ± 1.1

CSR

1.2 ± 1.1

8.1 ± 2.5

5.1 ± 1.2

TDC vs. CSR

Yang 2014 [9]

China

RCT

1b, 24

100

SHSMA

7.4

Age 3–12 years, Weight > 10 kg, VSD > 3 mm

TDC

5.5 ± 2.6

22.1 ± 13.8

5.2 ± 6.1

CSR

5.8 ± 2.4

20.5 ± 12.4

5.9 ± 5.3

Liu 2012 [10]

China

RCS

2b, 18

100

SHSMA

6.2 ± 2.3

Age > 3 years, Weight > 10 kg, VSD < 16 mm

TDC

18.1 ± 15.1

NA

4.1 ± 1.4

CSR

7.5 ± 9.4

NA

6.3 ± 4.1

Pawelec-Wojtalik 2005 [11]

Poland

RCS

2b, 15

100

AGA

6.4 ± 2.2

Weight > 5 kg

TDC

7.8 ± 6.4

28.1 ± 21.3

6.2 ± 1.1

CSR

2.6 ± 2.3

16.7 ± 8.4

4.8 ± 0.9

Cheng 2007 [34]

China

PCS

2b, 18

100

AGA

NA

Weight > 10 kg, VSD < 12 mm

TDC

7.5 ± 2.4

NA

4.8 ± 2.3

CSR

4.4 ± 2.5

NA

8.2 ± 2.3

Zheng 2009 [35]

China

RCS

2b, 17

77.8

AGA

NA

Age > 2.5 years, Weight > 11 kg, VSD 3–12 mm

TDC

2.5–15.5

11–63.5

3–12

CSR

2.8–52.5

11.5–68

3–36

Oses 2010 [36]

Canada

RCS

2b, 16

100

AGA

6.4 ± 2.2

VSD size < 6 mm, no age or Weight limit. VSD size > 6 mm, age > 6 years or Weight > 6 kg

TDC

9.1 ± 5.1

NA

9.4 ± 3.9

CSR

1.8 ± 3.6

NA

Chen 2014 [37]

China

RCS

2b, 16

100

SHSMA

6.5 ± 2.1

Isolated pmVSD

TDC

16 ± 11.7

41.3 ± 18.5

4.1 ± 1.2

CSR

3.8 ± 2.4

15.3 ± 5.3

4.3 ± 1.3

Zhu 2007 [38]

China

RCS

2b, 16

100

AGA, SHSMA

8.1 ± 2.5

NA

TDC

11 ± 8

33 ± 17

4.4 ± 1.1

CSR

3–51

33 ± 16

5.2 ± 1

Chen 2015 [39]

China

RCS

2b, 17

100

NA

NA

Age > 2 years, Weight > 8 kg, VSD < 14 mm

TDC

5 ± 1.2

16.5 ± 4.5

4.3 ± 1.7

CSR

4.9 ± 1.4

16.2 ± 5

5.4 ± 1.6

Xiao 2008 [40]

China

RCS

2b, 15

100

AGA

NA

Age > 3 years, Weight > 5 kg, VSD < 12 mm

TDC

11.2 ± 6.8

NA

5.6 ± 1.3

CSR

12 ± 7.6

NA

6.1 ± 1.8

Chen 2010 [41]

China

RCS

2b, 16

94.9

Lifetech Med

NA

Age > 3 years, Weight > 10 kg, VSD < 10 mm

TDC

10.6 ± 11.1

NA

5.5 ± 2.4

CSR

8.3 ± 7.9

NA

7.4 ± 6

TDC vs. PDC

Huang 2019 [42]

China

RCS

2b, 16

100

Lifetech Med and AGA

6.6 ± 2.8

isolated VSD with no AR

TDC

6.2 ± 6.3

33.1 ± 21.5

5.9 ± 2.3

PDC

6.5 ± 5.2

31.5 ± 23.4

6.1 ± 2.1

PDC vs. TDC vs. CSR

Fang 2018 [43]

China

RCS

2b, 17

100

Shandong Visee

6–14

isolated VSD with no PAH

PDC

1.6 ± 1.3

10.1 ± 2.3

5.3 ± 1.1

TDC

2.1 ± 0.8

10.6 ± 2.8

5.1 ± 1

CSR

1.4 ± 1.5

9.5 ± 3.1

5.9 ± 1.1

Chen 2019 [44]

China

RCS

2b, 17

100

Shandong Visee and AGA

4.8 ± 1.4

restrictive pmVSD with no severe PAH

PDC

2.7 ± 1.5

18.8 ± 2.3

4.3 ± 0.7

TDC

2.9 ± 0.7

19.7 ± 3.9

4.2 ± 0.9

CSR

2.7 ± 1.1

19.3 ± 3.0

4.4 ± 0.8

  1. PDC perventricular device closure; TDC transcatheter device closure; CSR conventional surgical repair; PCS Prospective cohort study; RCS retrospective cohort study; VSD ventricular septal defects; pmVSD perimembranous VSD; yr year; mm millimeter; RCT Randomized controlled trial; NA not available; SHSMA Shanghai Shape Memory Alloy Co., Ltd.; AGA AGA Medical Corporation; Lifetech Med Lifetech Scientific Co., Ltd.; Shandong Visee Shandong Visee Medical Devices Co., Ltd.; AR aortic regurgitation; PAH pulmonary artery hypertension; PDC perventricular device closure; TDC transcatheter device closure; CSR conventional surgical repair; *Studies were categorized by Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence and assessed by Downs and Black scoring system [19, 20]; †Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) or just range