Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

From: A meta-analysis of comparison of proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer

Author, year Country Surgical procedures Patients, n Follow-up (months) Oncological outcomes NOS
PG-DT TG PG-DT TG PG-DT TG PG-DT TG
Cho et al, 2018 Korea Laparoscopic /Robotic Laparoscopic /Robotic 38 42 24 100% 100% 8
Furukawa et al, 2018 Japan Laparoscopic Laparoscopic 27 48 30 48.5 100% 100% 8
Jung et al, 2017 Korea Laparoscopic Laparoscopic 92 156 12–24 100% 98% 9
Kim et al, 2016 Korea Laparoscopic Laparoscopic 17 17 18 100% 100% 8
Nomura et al, 2018 Japan Laparoscopic Laparoscopic 15 30 12 100% 100% 7
Park et al, 2018 Korea Laparoscopic Laparoscopic 46 34 24 100% 98% 8
Sugiyama et al, 2018 Japan Laparoscopic Laparoscopic 10 20 6–12 100% 100% 8
  1. PG-DT, Proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction; TG, Total gastrectomy;
  2. NOS, Quality Assessment based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale