Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient’s clinicopathological characteristics of RATG and LATG group for AGC

From: Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: short-term outcomes at a mono-institution

Characteristics

RATG (n = 99)

LATG (n = 106)

P value

Gender (n, %)

0.335

 Male

58 (58.6)

55 (51.9)

 

 Female

41 (41.4)

51 (48.1)

 

 Age (mean ± SD, years)

58.7 ± 6.7

59.0 ± 7.3

0.743

 Body mass index (median and range, kg/m2)

23.9 (17.3–28.6)

23.9 (19.9–28.3)

0.548

location of neoplasm (n, %)

0.350

 Corpora ventriculi

66 (66.7)

64 (62.7)

 

 Fundus ventriculi

33 (33.3)

42 (37.3)

 

T stage (n, %)

0.840

 2

26 (26.3)

28 (26.4)

 

 3

40 (40.4)

39 (36.8)

 

 4

33 (33.3)

39 (36.8)

 

N stage (n, %)

0.861

 0

30 (30.3)

28 (26.4)

 

 1

30 (30.3)

29 (27.4)

 

 2

16 (16.2)

18 (17.0)

 

 3a

16 (16.2)

20 (18.9)

 

 3b

7 (7.1)

11 (10.4)

 

pTNM (n, %)

0.376

 1b

2 (2.0)

3 (2.8)

 

 2a

23 (23.2)

22 (20.8)

 

 2b

31 (31.3)

29 (27.4)

 

 3a

27 (27.3)

24 (22.6)

 

 3b

13 (13.1)

17 (16.0)

 

 3c

3 (3.0)

11 (10.4)

 

ASA score (n, %)

0.900

 1

52 (52.5)

53 (50.0)

 

 2

40 (40.4)

44 (41.5)

 

 3

7 (7.1)

9 (8.5)

 

 diameter of neoplasm (mm)

47.6 ± 12.7

47.0 ± 12.4

0.763

  1. RATG robotic-assisted total gastrectomy, LATG laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy, TNM tumor node metastasis staging, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists