Skip to main content

Table 2 Management and outcome data of reported cases of DSF after gastrectomy for malignant disease

From: Management of duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for malignant disease: a systematic review of the literature

Author/Year

Management

Outcomes

Hospital stay,

Healing time,

DSF-related

median days (range)

median days (range)

mortality rate (%)

Conservative

Endoscopic

Percutaneous

Surgical

Transhepatic biliary diversion

Abscess/Abdominal drainage

Duodenostomy

Garden et al./1988 [9]

5

0

0

5

0

0

Conservative: 5/5 solved

NA

35 (17–71)a

0% (0/5)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: 5/5 solved

Surgical: −/−

Bloch et al./1989 [10]

0

1

0

0

0

0

Conservative: −/−

NA

35

0% (0/1)

Endoscopic: 1/1 solved

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: −/−

Kyzer et al./1997 [11]

1

0

0

0

0

1

Conservative: 1/1 solved

NA

NA

50% (1/2)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: 0/1 solved

Wong et al./2000 [12]

0

1

0

0

0

0

Conservative: −/−

NA

2

0% (0/1)

Endoscopic: 1/1 solved

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: −/−

Oh et al./2009 [13]

0

0

0

0

0

5

Conservative: −/−

NA

18 (10–28)a

0% (0/5)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: 5/5 solved

Lee et al./2009 [14]

0

1

0

0

0

0

Conservative: −/−

34

17

0% (0/1)

Endoscopic: 1/1 solved

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: −/−

Cozzaglio et al./2010 [5]

51

0

4

15

2

27

Conservative: NA/NA

21 (7–65) without complications; 31 (1–1035) with complications

19 (1–1035)

16.2% (11/68)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: NA/NA

Surgical: NA/NA

Hur et al./2010 [15]

0

0

0

0

4

1

Conservative: −/−

48 (30–158)

21 (12–44)

0% (0/4)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: 3/4 solved

Surgical: 1/1 solved

Cozzaglio et al./2011 [16]

6

0

6

5

0

0

Conservative: 0/6 solved

63 (40–167)

63 (40–621)

50% (3/6)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: 0/5 PAD; 3/6 PTBD-OD solved

Surgical: −/−

Curcio et al./2012 [17]

0

1

1

1

0

0

Conservative: −/−

NA

60

0% (0/1)

Endoscopic: 1/1 solved

Percutaneous: 0/2 solved

Surgical: −/−

Oh et al./2013 [18]

0

0

0

0

10

0

Conservative: −/−

32 (18–57)

51 (23–89)

0% (0/10)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: 10/10 solved

Surgical: −/−

Blouhos et al./2013 [19]

0

0

0

0

0

1

Conservative: −/−

36

45

0% (0/1)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: 1/1 solved

Vasiliadis et al./2014 [20]

0

0

0

0

0

1

Conservative: −/−

17

15

0% (0/1)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: 1/1 solved

Kim et al./2014 [21]

3

0

0

0

0

10

Conservative: 3/3 solved

26 (12–140)

11.7 (8–18) conservative group, 57.3 (14–134) surgical groupa

15.4% (2/13)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: 8/10 solved

Orsenigo et al./2014 [3]

11

0

3

5

0

13

Conservative: 11/11 solved

NA

31.2 ± 19.7 (conservative, PTBD and drainage); 45.2 ± 57.4 (surgical)a

9.4% (3/32)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: 8/8 solved

Surgical: 10/13 solved

Cornejo et al./2016 [22]

5

0

0

0

0

8

Conservative: 5/5 solved

39.5 (26–65) conservative; 34.3 (13–84) surgicala

NA

46.2% (6/13)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: 2/8 solved

Cozzaglio et al./2016 [4]

0

0

0

0

0

75

Conservative: −/−

39 (22–68) solved; 32 (18–41) overall

28.5 (18–60) 1 surgical operation; 63 (50–82) > 1 surgical operation

28% (21/75)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: 54/75 solved

Ali et al./2016 [7]

5

0

0

11

3

5

Conservative: 5/5 solved

22 (11–96)

NA

0% (0/24)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: 14/14 solved

Surgical: 5/5 solved

Paik et al./2016 [6]

6

0

6

1

0

3

Conservative: 6/6 solved

27.5 (15–54) solved group

NA

12,5% (2/16)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: 6/7 solved

Surgical: 2/3 solved

Ramos et al./2018 [2]

8

0

0

0

0

7

Conservative: 5/8 solved

NA

NA

40% (6/15)

Endoscopic: −/−

Percutaneous: −/−

Surgical: 4/7 solved

  1. amean, NA not available