Skip to main content

Table 1 Scale assessment of the quality of the studies

From: Assessement of postoperative long-term survival quality and complications associated with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Author

Year

Location

Study

Group

Cases

Gender

Age

Follow-up time (month)

Newcastle – Ottawa scale Selection/comparability/Exposure = total score

Male

Female

PAUL TROTTMA [11].

2014

America

Retrospective

RAMPS

6

NA

NA

NA

NA

3/1/2 = 6

DP

20

NA

NA

NA

NA

Toshiya Abe [12]

2016

Japan

Retrospective

RAMPS

53

31

22

68.6 ± 10.7

267.3 ± 11.5

4/2/2 = 8

DP

40

29

11

65.2 ± 8.6

339.4 ± 13.2

Eun Young Kim [13]

2017

Korea

Retrospective

RAMPS

30

13

17

63.7 ± 8.2

33(8–97)

4/1/2 = 7

DP

19

7

12

62.1 ± 8.5

33(8–97)

Hyo Jun Park [14]

2014

Korea

Retrospective

RAMPS

38

23

15

62.17 (40–75)

18.2 (3.0–82.1)

4/2/3 = 9

DP

54

35

19

61.25 (37–79)

15.7 (4.4–148.5)

MARCO LATORRE [15]

2013

Italy

Retrospective

RAMPS

8

5

3

61

NA

4/1/2 = 7

DP

17

11

6

60

NA