Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient demographics and characteristics of the flaps

From: Treatment of deep cavities using a perforator-based island flap with partial de-epithelization

No.

Age range (years)

Defect

Size, (cm2)

Depth of cavity (cm)

Size of de-epithelization (cm2)

Perforator

Follow-up (months)

Complication

1

70–79

Sacral sore

10 × 6

3

6 × 3

SGAP

25

None

2

80–89

Sacral sore

17 × 10

5

10 × 5

SGAP

20

None

3

60–69

Ischial sore

8 × 5

2

5 × 2

DFP

18

None

4

50–59

Meningomyelocele

10 × 4

4

5 × 4

SGAP

18

None

5

60–69

Sacral sore

15 × 13

3

10 × 3

SGAP

18

None

6

80–89

Sacral sore

11 × 7

4

6 × 4

IGAP

17

None

7

70–79

Ischial sore

12 × 10

3

8 × 3

DFP

15

None

8

60–69

Sacral sore

12 × 10

4

10 × 4

SGAP

15

None

9

50–59

Meningomyelocele

7 × 3

4

4 × 3

SGAP

15

None

10

30–39

Cutaneous fistula

4 × 4

9

9 × 4

DIEP

13

Congestion

11

30–39

Sacral sore

10 × 10

2

10 × 2

SGAP

13

None

12

30–39

Cutaneous fistula

4 × 4

9

9 × 4

DIEP

13

Partial necrosis

13

60–69

Trochanter sore

9 × 7

3

7 × 3

TFLP

13

None

14

50–59

Sacral sore

9 × 5

3

5 × 3

IGAP

13

None

15

60–69

Sacral sore

10 × 11

4

8 × 4

SGAP

12

None

16

40–49

Sacral sore

4 × 2

3

3 × 2

IGAP

12

None

17

40–49

Ischial sore

12 × 6

4

6 × 4

DFP

12

None

18

70–79

Cutaneous fistula

3 × 4

4

4 × 4

DIEP

10

None

19

80–89

Trochanter sore

8 × 6

2

6 × 2

TFLP

10

None

20

80–89

Trochanter sore

6 × 5

1

4 × 1

TFLP

10

None

21

60–69

Sacral

15 × 8

4

8 × 4

SGAP

7

None

  1. Abbreviations: SGAP Superior gluteal artery perforator, DFP Deep femoral artery perforator, IGAP Inferior gluteal artery perforator, DIEP Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator, TFLP Tensor fascia lata perforator