Skip to main content

Table 1 The detailed characteristics of patients

From: Clinical significance of three-dimensional skeleton-arterial model in the management of delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures

Case

Age/gender

Classification

Associated Injuries

Days following injury (day)

Surgical approach

Surgical time (min)

Intraoperative blood loss (ml)

Matta’s method

d’Aubigné–Postel score

1

40–49/1

Both columns

Chest and Craniocerebral injuries

67

Pararectus and Kocher–langenbeck approach

420

2300

Imperfect

Good

2

30–39/1

Both columns

Chest injuries

45

Ilio-inguinal and Kocher–langenbeck approach

285

1200

Anatomic

Excellent

3

20–29/1

Transverse and posterior wall

Abdominal injuries, closed internal degloving injury

42

Kocher–langenbeck approach

125

600

Imperfect

Excellent

4

30–39/1

T shape

Craniocerebral and abdominal injuries

36

Ilio-inguinal and Kocher–langenbeck approach

160

1000

Anatomic

Excellent

5

40–49/1

Both columns

Chest injuries

64

Ilio-inguinal and Kocher–langenbeck approach

310

1500

Imperfect

Good

6

30–39/2

Both columns

Abdominal injuries

54

Ilio-inguinal and Kocher–langenbeck approach

210

1900

Imperfect

Good

7

40–49/1

Both columns

Craniocerebral and chest injuries

29

Ilio-inguinal approach

150

800

Anatomic

Excellent

8

40–49/1

Both columns

Craniocerebral injuries

32

Pararectus approach

135

700

Anatomic

Excellent