Skip to main content

Table 2 Intra- and postoperative data of Totally Implantable Access Port (TIAP) implantation using either Central Vein Puncture (CVP) or modified vein cut-down using hydrophilic coated guide-wire (TVS) as a second line rescue strategy

From: Use of a hydrophilic coating wire reduces significantly the rate of central vein punctures and the incidence of pneumothorax in totally implantable access port (TIAP) surgery

 

All Patients n (%)

Central Vein Puncture as a second line rescue strategy n (%)

Use of guidewire with a hydrophilic coating as a second line strategy n (%)

p*

n

277

69

208

 

Mean operation time (SD)

37.7 min (± 20.9 min)

35.6 min (± 16.8 min)

38.4 min (± 22.2 min)

0.347

Operation performed by Resident alone (n)

76 (27.5%)

16 (23.2%)

60 (28.8%)

0.351

Operation performed by Attending alone (n)

171 (61.7%)

45 (65.2%)

126 (60.6%)

0.568

Operation performed by Resident and Attending

30 (10.8%)

8 (11.6%)

22 (10.6%)

0.814

Early Morbidity

 Intraoperative bleeding

3 (1%)

0 (0%)

3 (1%)

0.316

 Pneumothorax

4 (1.4%)

3 (4.3%)

1 (0.5%)

0.020

 Need for thorax drainage

1 (0.4%)

1 (1.4%)

0 (0%)

0.082

Late Morbidity

 Thrombosis

2 (0.7%)

0 (0%)

2 (0.9%)

0.414

 TIAP Infection

17 (6.1%)

3 (1.4%)

14 (6.7%)

0.475

 Sepsis due to TIAP Infection

14 (5%)

2 (2.9%)

12 (5.7%)

0.346

 Non-Function due to dislocation

8 (2.9%)

2 (2.9%)

6 (2.9%)

0.995

 Pinch-off syndrome

1 (0.4%)

0 (0%)

1 (0.5%)

0.564

 Postoperative hematoma

2 (0.7%)

0 (0%)

2 (0.9%)

0.414

 Removal of TIAP

26 (9.4%)

6 (8.7%)

20 (9.6%)

0.803

  1. Abbreviations: SD = standard deviation, TIAP = Totally Implantable Access Port, CVP = Central Vein Puncture, TVS = vein cut down using a guidewire with a hydrophilic coating; Terumo® Venae Sectio
  2. *p value determined according to the Kruskal Wallis Test for continuous variables and Chi-squared Test for dichotomous variables