Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study groups

From: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus modified Barker Vacuum Pack as temporary abdominal closure technique for Open Abdomen management: a four-year experience

Variable

General (N = 83)

NPWT (N = 65)

mBVT (N = 18)

P-value (NPWT vs mBVT)

Gender, n (%)

 - male

 - female

46 (55.4)

37 (44.6)

35 (53.8)

30 (46.2)

11 (61.1)

7 (38.9)

0.58

Age (yrs), mean (±SD)

60.9 (±16.1)

63.8 (±14.1)

62.9 (±16.3)

0.82

Diagnosis, n (%)

 - sepsis

 - trauma

73 (87.9)

10 (12.1)

58 (89.2)

7 (10.8)

15 (83.3)

3 (16.7)

0.49

Comorbidities, n (%)

 - yes

 - no

75 (90.4)

8 (9.6)

59 (90.8)

6 (9.2)

14 (77.8)

4 (22.2)

0.13

Provenience of pts., n (%)

 - ICU

 - Ward

 - ED

20 (24.1)

35 (42.2)

28 (33.7)

15 (23.1)

28 (43.1)

22 (33.8)

5 (27.8)

6 (33.3)

7 (38.9)

0.75

ISS, mean (±SD)a

40.3 (±10.7)

41.9 (±12.2)

30.3 (±8.0)

0.18

ASA, mean (±SD)

3.9 (±1)

3.7 (±0.9)

3.7 (±1)

0.90

  1. NPWT negative pressure wound therapy, mBVT modified Barker Vacuum Technique, pts. patients, SD standard deviation, ICU Intensive Care Unit, ED Emergency Department
  2. adata from 10 trauma patients