This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Does intraoperative closed-suction drainage influence the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 14 March 2017
Accepted: 10 May 2017
Published: 16 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kostiantyn Kopchak|
|14 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Konrad Kobryn|
|20 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Uwe Wittel|
|2 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ophélie Aumont|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ophélie Aumont|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|16 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12893-017-0257-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.