This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
How participation in surgical mortality audit impacts surgical practice
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 15 February 2017
Accepted: 7 April 2017
Published: 19 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Niccolo Petrucciani|
|12 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luigi Bonavina|
|12 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graziano Pernazza|
|19 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stefano Scabini|
|19 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bruno Pereira|
|27 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Chi-Wai Lui|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Chi-Wai Lui|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12893-017-0240-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.