This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Is soft tissue repair a right choice to avoid early dislocation after THA in posterior approach?
- Yiqin Zhou†1,
- Shiqi Cao†1,
- Lintao Li†1, 2,
- Manoj Narava3,
- Qiwei Fu1Email author and
- Qirong Qian1Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 27 October 2016
Accepted: 8 February 2017
Published: 19 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roland Biber|
|22 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mariano Fernández-Fairén|
|8 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Yiqin Zhou|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roland Biber|
|6 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yiqin Zhou|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yiqin Zhou|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12893-017-0212-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.