Table 2 Comparison of published data of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in other studies
Author (year) | Ref No. | Approach | Number of cases | Morbidity | Mortality | Harvest lymph nodes | Negative surgical margin | Median survival | Five-year survival |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(months) | |||||||||
Brennan (1996) [4] | 4 | Standard | 34 | 23 % | 0 % | 13 | 68 % | 12 | 14 % |
Mitchem (2012) [12] | 15 | RAMPS | 47 | 39 % | 0 % | 18.0 | 91.0 % | 26 | 36 % |
Chang (2012) [13] | 16 | RAMPS | 24 | 37.5 % | 0 % | 20.9 | 91.7 % | 18.2 | NA |
Latorre (2013) [17] | 20 | RAMPS | 8 | 25 % | 0 % | 20.7 | 87.5 % | 14 | 26 % |
Trottman (2014) [16] | 19 | RAMPS | 6 | 50 % | 0 % | 11.2 | 100 % | NA | NA |
Kitagawa (2014) [5] | 5 | RAMPS | 24 | 58 % | 0 % | 24 | 88 % | NA | 53 % |
Park (2014) [6] | 6 | Standard | 54 | 22.2 % | 0 % | 9 | 85.1 % | NA | 12.0 % |
RAMPS | 38 | 18.4 % | 0 % | 14 | 89.5 % | NA | 40.1 % | ||
Our study (2015) | – | RAMPS | 49 | 41 % | 0 % | 15 | 83.7 % | 22.6 | 27 % |