Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of inpatient vs. outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective case series

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Villavicencio
25 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilco C. Peul
10 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kostas Fountas
21 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jeffrey Liu
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kostas Fountas
16 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Villavicencio
27 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jeffrey Liu
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jeffrey Liu
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
5 Mar 2009 Editorially accepted
5 Mar 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2482-9-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement