Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Nov 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donna Caniano
2 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Muhammed Ashraf Memon
5 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Massimo Chiarugi
24 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthias Johannes Kraemer
18 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Alun Jones
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Muhammed Ashraf Memon
21 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Massimo Chiarugi
28 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donna Caniano
2 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Alun Jones
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Alun Jones
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Aug 2007 Author responded Author comments - Alun Jones
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Aug 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Aug 2007 Editorially accepted
10 Aug 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2482-7-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement