Systematic quantitative overviews of the literature to determine the value of diagnostic tests for predicting acute appendicitis: study protocol
© Bachmann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002
Received: 07 March 2002
Accepted: 10 April 2002
Published: 10 April 2002
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Mar 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Mar 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dave Flum|
|18 Mar 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stefan Sauerland|
|20 Mar 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Lucas M. Bachmann|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Mar 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Mar 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stefan Sauerland|
|9 Apr 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dave Flum|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Apr 2002||Editorially accepted|
|10 Apr 2002||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-2-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.