Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Surgery

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Functional outcome after perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse

  • Franc H Hetzer1Email author,
  • Amir H Roushan1,
  • Katja Wolf1,
  • Ulrich Beutner1,
  • Jan Borovicka2,
  • Jochen Lange1 and
  • Lukas Marti1
BMC Surgery201010:9

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-10-9

Received: 14 December 2009

Accepted: 8 March 2010

Published: 8 March 2010

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gaudenz Curti
29 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Sykora
11 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Franc Hetzer
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Franc Hetzer
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
8 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
8 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2482-10-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
(2)
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland

Advertisement