Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographics in the two groups

From: Hexaxial external fixator versus intramedullary nail in treating segmental tibial fractures: a retrospective study

Variable

HEF(n = 22)

IMN(n = 20)

P-value

Gender

  

0.569

 Male

14(63.6)

11(55.0)

 

 Female

8(36.4)

9(45.0)

Age (year)

46.00 ± 9.7

41.80 ± 12.1

0.220

Injury mechanism

  

0.435

 Traffic accident injury

15(68.2)

10(50.0)

 

 High falling injury

2(9.1)

4(20.0)

 

 Crushing injury

5(22.7)

6(30.0)

 

Soft tissue damage

  

0.973

 Skin integrity

9(40.9)

8(40.0)

 

 Blunt contusion

7(31.8)

7(35.0)

 

 Open injury

6(27.3)

5(25.0)

 

Open/closed fracture

  

0.867

 Open

6(27.3)

5(25.0)

 

 Closed

16(72.7)

15(75.0)

Gustilo-Anderson grading

  

0.885

 Type I

3(13.6)

3(15.0)

 

 Type II

2(9.1)

1(5.0)

 Type III

1(4.5)

1(5.0)

Time elapsed since the injury to definitive treatment (day)

5.32 ± 2.7

6.00 ± 2.7

0.419

  1. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or frequency (%); HEF Hexaxial external fixator, IMN Intramedullary nail