Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of the pelvic measurements in 382 patients

From: What affects the selection of diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study

Variable(mm)

Without DI

(n = 182)

With DI

(n = 200)

Univariate analysis

pvalue

multivariate analysis

OR(95%CI) pvalue

intertuberous distance

106.00(97.98,116.13)

99.00(94.03,109.93)

*<0.001

0.99(0.97–1.03) 0.971

sacrococcygeal distance

119.01 ± 12.23

121.93 ± 13.06

*0.025

1.02(0.99–1.03) 0.130

midpelvic anteroposterior diameter

109.00(103.88,115.00)

107.05(100.00,112.40)

*0.009

0.98(0.95–1.01) 0.206

pubic symphysis height

38.40 ± 3.90

38.11 ± 4,28

0.498

 

interspinous distance

97.40(89.98,107.33)

91.15(86.00,99.58)

*<0.001

0.97(0.93-1.00) 0.047

anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic inlet

108.87 ± 9.77

108.09 ± 12.48

0.499

 

anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic outlet

89.71 ± 9.72

88.90 ± 8.35

0.385

 

Angle α

43.00(39.15,48.03)

43.10(38.90,47.18)

0.954

 

superior margin of pubic symphysis to coccyx distance

117.66 ± 9.60

116.13 ± 8.97

0.107

 
  1. OR odds ratio,CI confidence-intervial.,Angle α between the pelvic inlet and extension of the anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic outlet. P values are derived from two-tailed tests.*Values are statistical significance (p<0.05)