Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic Imaging

From: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute appendicitis patients in a tertiary care center in Lebanon

Imaging Modalities (N = 342)

Pre-Pandemic Period

(N = 201)

Pandemic Period

(N = 141)

P-value

CT

299(87.4%)

174(86.6%)

125(88.7%)

0.398

Ultrasound

21(6.1%)

13(6.5%)

8(5.27%)

CT and Ultrasound

14(4.1%)

11(5.5%)

3(2.1%)

MRI and Ultrasound

2(0.6%)

1(0.5%)

1(0.7%)

None

6(1.8%)

2(1%)

4(2.8%)

CT Findings (N = 313)

Evidence of Peri-appendicular abscess

20(6.4%)

13(7%)

7(5.5%)

0.419

Evidence of Perforation

28(8.9%)

17(9.2%)

11(8.6%)

0.478

Evidence of Peri-appendicular fluid

103(32.9%)

64(34.6%)

39(30.5%)

0.375

Evidence of appendicolith

79(25.2%)

43(23.2%)

36(28.1%)

0.289

Thickening of the appendix wall

218(69.6%)

132(71.4%)

86(67.2%)

0.718

Diameter of appendix

Above 7 mm

249(79.6%)

150(81.1%)

99(77.3%)

0.749

Below 7 mm

11(3.5%)

5(2.7%)

6(4.7%)

Exactly 7 mm

24(7.7%)

14(7.6%)

10(7.8%)

Ultrasound Findings (N = 37)

Evidence of Peri-appendicular abscess

1(2.7%)

1(4%)

0(0%)

1.00

Evidence of Perforation

2(5.4%)

1(4%)

1(8.3%)

1.00

Evidence of Peri-appendicular fluid

13(35.1%)

9(36.0%)

4(33.3%)

1.00

Evidence of appendicolith

4(10.8%)

2(8%)

2(16.7%)

0.582

Thickening of the appendix wall

23(62.2%)

14(56.0%)

9(75%)

0.306

Diameter of appendix

    

Above 7 mm

19(51.4%)

13(52%)

6(50%)

0.781

Below 7 mm

4(10.8%)

3(12%)

1(8.3%)

Exactly 7 mm

5(13.5%)

2(8%)

3(25%)