Table 2 The results of the questionnaire surveys of surgeons participated in the simulation-based workshop regarding the comparison of the two simulators
From: Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study
Evaluation Form Item | Strongly Agree (n 18), (100%) | Agree (n 18), (100%) |
|---|---|---|
The simulation workshop was a valuable learning experience | (18), (100%) | |
The cleft palate repair simulation based-learning workshop was a useful exercise | (18), (100%) | |
The cleft palate simulator should be integrated into senior residency or fellowship training | (18), (100%) | |
I would use the cleft palate simulator again for practice | (15), (83.3%) | (3), (16.6%) |
I would recommend this simulation workshop to my colleagues | (18), (100%) | |
What is your favorite simulator? | ||
Porcine tongue simulator | 8 (44%) | |
3D-Printed simulator | 8 (44%) | |
Both simulators | 2(11%) | |