Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic local resection for gastric submucosal tumors: a single-center experience of 266 patients
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 November 2016
Accepted: 25 March 2017
Published: 4 April 2017
Laparoscopic resections for submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the stomach have been developed rapidly over the past decade. Several types of laparoscopic methods for gastric SMTs have been created. We assessed the short-term outcomes of two commonly used types of laparoscopic local resection (LLR) for gastric SMTs and reported our findings.
We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological results of 266 patients with gastric SMTs whom underwent LLR between January 2006 and September 2016. 228 of these underwent laparoscopic exogastric wedge resection (LEWR), the remaining 38 patients with the tumors near the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) or antrum underwent laparoscopic transgastric resection (LTR).
All the patients underwent laparoscopic resections successfully. The mean operation times of LEWR and LTR were 90.2 ± 37.2 min and 101.7 ± 38.5 min respectively. The postoperative length of hospital stays for LEWR and LTR were 5.1 ± 2.1 days and 5.3 ± 1.7 days respectively. There was a low complication rate (4.4%) and zero mortality in our series.
ELWR is technically feasible therapy of gastric SMTs. LTR is secure and effective for gastric intraluminal SMTs located near the EGJ or antrum.
KeywordsLaparoscopy Gastrectomy Submucosal tumors Complications
Submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the stomach are defined as tumors located beneath the gastric mucosa and include gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), schwannomas, leiomyomas, malignant lymphomas, lymphangiomas, lipomas, hemangiomas, heterotopic pancreas, et al. . We can always perceive gastric SMTs accidently, which make up 2% of whole gastric neoplasms . A broad clinical spectrum was shown from benign to malignant. It seems tough to deal with diagnosis of the tumors before the operation and evaluation of the extent of latent malignancy. Moreover, even a benign tumor can cause a variety of complications such obstruction and bleeding. Therefore, surgical excision of the lesions remains the first choice. Achieving a disease-free margin to complete the partial excision of the tumor is favored and lymphadenectomy is not usually needed, because nearly 80% of gastric SMTs are GISTs, whose periodicity of lymph node metastasis is low [3, 4].
Laparoscopic resection, which has been regarded as the most appropriate treatment, not only offers minimal normal tissue loss and maintains gastrointestinal continuity, but is also characterized by minimally invasive to the patient. Exogastric laparoscopic wedge resection (ELWR) is the most prevailing laparoscopic local resection (LLR). However, as to neoplasms located at cardia, especially near the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), or lay to antrum, LEWR increases the risk of generating stenosis or deformity in the gastric inlet or outlet . Based on our extensive laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) [6–10], we developed laparoscopic transgastric resection (LTR) for tumors located at cardia or antrum to avoid a total, proximal or distal gastrectomy. We herein give notice to our results from these two types of laparoscopic resection methods and also an assessment of the postoperative surgical outcomes to evaluate the feasibility and safety of those procedures.
At the Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, 266 patients suffered LLR for probable gastric SMTs. In order to assess the site, dimension, and development mode of the tumor, all of patients experienced preoperative process, including gastroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and abdominal computed tomography (CT). Some patients with enormous tumors were diagnosed before the operation, whose tumors may have intruded on neighboring organs, including various organs because of metastatic disease, or suffered an emergency surgery due to acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. These people were not taken account into the research. Written consent was obtained from every patient prior to enrollment in the study, which was confirmed by the Zhejiang University’s Ethics Committee.
People analyzed retrospectively and kept track of demographic message, surgical procedures, pathologic message, clinical presentation, and the process for these patients after operation. Pathologic features of GIST patients were studied, including tumor size, location, mitotic rate and Fletcher classification . On the basis of the Risk Assessment Classification presented by Fletcher and colleagues, the GISTs were quadripartite.  (National Institutes of Health [NIH] consensus criteria). A skilled pathologist counted mitotic figures for total specimen in 50 high-power fields (HPFs), which were chosen at random. We also analyzed surgical outcomes involved with the loss of blood, the time of operation, and complications after operation et al.
If the imageological examinations or intraoperative findings showed the tumor was near the pylorus. Resection commenced with dissection of the appropriate section of the greater omentum with ultrasonic coagulating shears. The short gastric vessels near the tumor were then transected to a height dependent on the level of transection. The right gastric artery was divided and cut. The left lobe of the liver was retracted upward, while the stomach was stretched downward to expose the lesser omentum. At this stage, dissection was continued at the side with the least curvature of the stomach. After mobilization of the pylorus, the excision was similar to those near EGJ.
LEWR (n = 228)
LTR (n = 38)
58.7 ± 11.8
52.4 ± 10.3
23.4 ± 3.6
23.5 ± 2.7
ASA classification (I/II/III)
Pathologic features of GIST patients
Pathologic features of GIST patients
LEWR (n = 203)
LTR (n = 26)
Tumor size (cm)
3.6 ± 2.5
2.1 ± 1.3
Mitotic rate (per 50 HPF)
5 ~ 10
Very low risk
Surgical and postoperative outcomes
Surgical outcomes of 266 patients
LEWR (n = 228)
LTR (n =38 )
Operation time (min)
90.2 ± 37.2
101.7 ± 38.5
Blood loss (mL)
50.4 ± 51.6
42.2 ± 30.2
First flatus (day)
2.4 ± 1.1
2.2 ± 0.9
Oral intake (days)
3.2 ± 1.1
3.0 ± 1.0
Postoperative hospital stay (days)
5.1 ± 2.1
5.3 ± 1.7
Delayed gastric emptying
Gastric SMTs are potentially life-threatening tumors. Although the majority of SMTs are benign, some have the potential to become malignant. GISTs make up a large portion of SMTs. It has been reported that the pathogenesis of GIST is closely related to mutations at c-Kit proto-oncogene, and GISTs that do not have c-Kit mutations might be correlated with gain-of-function mutations of platelet-derived growth factor-a (PDGFRa) . Secondary to these findings, imatinib mesylate (Gleevec®) therapy, which can inhibit the intracellular kinase activities of CD117 and PDGFRa, has been manifested to increase the overall tumor control rate of GIST by 85%. It has been report that Gleevec® is the standard treatment for unresectable or metastatic GIST in many countries . However, resection remains the first option for primary GIST. On the one hand, it can establish the diagnosis; on the other hand, it may be curative. SMTs that are not obviously benign should be excised as assumed GISTs. Patients with a diagnosis for GISTs are mainly treated by laparoscopic local resection .
Lukaszczyk and colleagues reported in 1992 the use of laparoscopy for gastric GIST resection in a patient . Since then, there have been multiple small series using the laparoscopic approach for these kinds of tumors. In this study, LLR was successfully performed within an acceptable operation time. It is lowest of the average blood loss and morbidity rate, and mortality hardly happened. All patients started oral feeding earlier, the average oral intake day is 3.2 days (range: 2 to 6 days) after the operation. Hospital stays were also short and acceptable. Pathologic examination of the surgical specimens showed that all surgical margins were microscopically tumor free (R0 resection). Although there are no randomized studies comparing laparoscopic versus open approach in the management of gastric SMTs, several retrospective studies have shown the advantages of the laparoscopic approach in treating gastric SMTs, with similar disease free survival, mortality and oncologic outcomes comparable with the open approach [16–24]. It is not only the technical potential of laparoscopic excision, but also its effectiveness facilitated by the data.
LLR can be distributed into ELWR or LTR according to the development mode, tumor measurement, and site. ELWR is the most ordinary method and the first thought for gastric SMTs. We can use the laparoscopic vision or the haptic retroaction of the laparoscopic tools to locate lesions straightly for the tumors which were located in the anterior wall along the greater curvature of the stomach. Considering the remarkable superfluity and mobility of the stomach in these sites, a laparoscopically stapled gastric wedge excision often is always greatly potential. With a project for a stapled wedge excision, it is easy to come near laparoscopically for tumors in this site. In order to avoid cardiac stricture for tumors located in the fundus, the left gastroepiploic artery should be transected. The gastrophrenic ligament and gastrosplenic ligament should be dissected for mobility of the stomach and then making sure there is enough distance between the cutting line and the left side of the cardia when applying the second staple. Otherwise it would cause stricture due to the Endo-GIA position being too close to the cardia. Because the stomach where tumors along the lesser curvature are short of redundancy, and the lesser curvature is restricted in length, so it is tough to treat laparoscopically. To make the posterior wall of the stomach clear, we are supposed to do dissection to part the stomach from the greater omentum. Then, the lesser curvature was everted and the tumor was removed. The vagus nerve branch (Latarjet nerves) and blood vessels in the lesser omentum should be protected.
For the reason that ELWR has the chance of stenosis or deformity conducing to excessive excision of the normal gastric wall, it is difficult to apply to tumors which are located close to the gastric inlet or outlet . In our series, there seemed to be 65 cases with tumors which were located close to the esophagogastric junction or the pylorus which were thought improper to undergo ELWR by laparoscopic stapling. We had better utilize ultrasonic coagulating shears with the excision margin paralleling the round edge of the tumor to reduce the fine tissue loss and to hold back luminal narrowing to operate manual excision, on condition that the tumor has exogastric development and is located on the anterior wall. Then, the laparoscopic intracorporeal hand-sewn method was used to close the incision. It is advisable to use the laparoscopic transgastric method for the excision of an intraluminal tumor which is located at the posterior wall of the stomach, which offered straight observation of the lesion and inner stomach, and brings greater command of the surgical margin. [25, 26]. The outcomes of our retrospective research proved that the process was secure and effective. Two cases had postoperative gastric intraluminal bleeding, but this was cured with a conservation treatment. In our experience, the exact site of tumors is crux of this method, which is using endoscopic before the operation, marking with titanium clips, intact redeployment of the EGJ or pylorus before excision, and step cutting transversely along the foundation of the tumor. However, restrictions related to attached bleeding venture and intraperitioneal contanmination by seeping gatric juices are common.[26, 27]. The endoscopic linear staple resection line of the stomach wall is weak and leakage and bleeding occur easily. Therefore, intracorporeal hand-sewn was used in our center to reinforce this area. Intraperitioneal contamination with gastric juice seemed to be a dominating problem of this technique, as the gastric cavity requires opening temporarily. Hence, it is necessary to operate abundant decompression of the stomach before gastrotomy and comprehensive irrigation of the operating area after closing the gastrotomy for preventing abdominal or wound infection.
There is another technique designed to resect tumors located near the EGJ or pylorus is laparoscopic intragastric resection . This technique involves a difficult procedure to set up the view before resection. By blowing up a balloon sticked on the trocars, the gastric wall is supposed to be attached to the abdominal wall after inserting several trocars into the gastric lumen through the gastric wall. This method not only offers an abundant operative area, but also generates less deformity of the EGJ compared with an extragastric approach. However, the need of specific ballon-type ports and the trouble originated from inserting the ports into stomach restricted its feasibility. In addition, if a tumor is larger than 4 cm, the intragastric resection is inapposite, because it is difficult to retract the large specimen orally. We did not use this method in our center.
If a relatively large tumor is located at EGJ and antrum, the surgeons must consider the problems incurred by LLR that include the possibility of stenosis and deforming the gastric inlet or outlet. For tumors located at antrum or large tumors in the lower stomach close to antrum, we recommended laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). For tumors at EGJ or large tumors in the middle or upper body we recommend laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) instead of laparoscopy proximal gastrectomy (LPG) due to the relatively lower rate of reflux esophagitis. Another tip, observation by flexible endoscope during the resection of the GIST is recommended to avoid gastric inlet or outlet narrowing. During endoscope examination, we looped the pylorus with a silk band to stop gas from entering the intestine, which would interfere with vision and subsequent manipulation.
Several limitations of this study warrant mention and require special attentions in the interpretation. First, because it was a retrospective study performed at a single institution, case selection was inevitably affected by bias. Second, the uneven surgical skills of the different surgeons might result in flaws of the study. Third, it’s a one-arm study and long-term outcomes were not evaluated because of the short observation period. Therefore, randomized controlled trials or prospective comparative studies with long-term follow-up are necessary to adequately evaluate the status of LLR for gastric SMTs.
In conclusion, for the reason that the process provides reasonable morbidity and well-pleasing short-term outcomes, it seems that ELWR is technically practicable for the therapy of gastric SMTs. For gastric intraluminal SMTs which are located close to the EGJ or pylorus, LTR is easy, secure, and efficient. When LLR are inappropriate for bulky tumors located at EGJ or antrum, LDG or LTG could be used to avoid stenosis.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy
Laparoscopic exogastric wedge resection
Laparoscopic local resection
Laparoscopy proximal gastrectomy
laparoscopic total gastrectomy
Laparoscopic transgastric resection
National Institutes of Health
Gastric submucosal tumors
The authors thank Hendi Maher from Australia for editing the English language.
This study was supported by the Nature Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No.LY12H16026) and the Chinese Medical Technology Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No.2012ZA087).
Availability of data and materials
The data will not be shared. As our article is a technique report, the datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available in the tables we provided in the manuscript.
KC designed the study; XFW, KC and STZ performed the operation; KC and YP wrote the manuscript. JHP, WHY and JFY collected data; WXF proofread and revised the manuscript; all authors have approved the version to be published.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This research was approved by the Zhejiang University’s Ethics Committee. Written consent was obtained from every patient prior to enrollment in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Guo J, Liu Z, Sun S, Wang S, Ge N, Liu X, Wang G, Liu W. Endosonography-assisted diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopic Ultrasound. 2013;2:125–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cheng HL, Lee WJ, Lai IR, Yuan RH, Yu SC. Laparoscopic wedge resection of benign gastric tumor. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:2100–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ryu KJ, Jung SR, Choi JS, Jang YJ, Kim JH, Park SS, Park BJ, Park SH, Kim SJ, Mok YJ, Kim CS. Laparoscopic resection of small gastric submucosal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:271–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pidhorecky I, Cheney RT, Kraybill WG, Gibbs JF. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: current diagnosis, biologic behavior, and management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:705–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tagaya N, Mikami H, Kubota K. Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors located in the upper stomach. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1469–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen K, Xu X, Mou Y, Pan Y, Zhang R, Zhou Y, Wu D, Huang C. Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and Billroth II gastrojejunostomy for gastric cancer: short- and medium-term results of 139 consecutive cases from a single institution. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10:1462–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen K, Mou YP, Xu XW, Pan Y, Zhou YC, Cai JQ, Huang CJ. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a 10-y single-center experience with meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2015;194:367–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen K, Mou YP, Xu XW, Cai JQ, Wu D, Pan Y, Zhang RC. Short-term surgical and long-term survival outcomes after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen K, Pan Y, Cai JQ, Xu XW, Wu D, Yan JF, Chen RG, He Y, Mou YP. Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy: A single-center 7-year experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:3432–40.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen K, Wu D, Pan Y, Cai JQ, Yan JF, Chen DW, Maher H, Mou YP. Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy using intracorporeally stapler or hand-sewn anastomosis for gastric cancer: a single-center experience of 478 consecutive cases and outcomes. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:115.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O'Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP, Shmookler B, Sobin LH, Weiss SW. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:459–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, Hashimoto K, Nishida T, Ishiguro S, Kawano K, Hanada M, Kurata A, Takeda M, Muhammad Tunio G, Matsuzawa Y, Kanakura Y, Shinomura Y, Kitamura Y. Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 1998;279:577–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Group LR. Gleevec for GIST. Available at: https://liferaftgroup.org/gleevec/. November 2012.
- Joensuu H, Fletcher C, Dimitrijevic S, Silberman S, Roberts P, Demetri G. Management of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3:655–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lukaszczyk JJ, Preletz RJ. Laparoscopic resection of benign stromal tumor of the stomach. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1992;2:331–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Catena F, Di Battista M, Fusaroli P, Ansaloni L, Di Scioscio V, Santini D, Pantaleo M, Biasco G, Caletti G, Pinna A. Laparoscopic treatment of gastric GIST: report of 21 cases and literature’s review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:561–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silberhumer GR, Hufschmid M, Wrba F, Gyoeri G, Schoppmann S, Tribl B, Wenzl E, Prager G, Laengle F, Zacherl J. Surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1213–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goh BK, Chow PK, Chok AY, Chan WH, Chung YF, Ong HS, Wong WK. Impact of the introduction of laparoscopic wedge resection as a surgical option for suspected small/medium-sized gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach on perioperative and oncologic outcomes. World J Surg. 2010;34:1847–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karakousis GC, Singer S, Zheng J, Gonen M, Coit D, DeMatteo RP, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a size-matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1599–605.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- De Vogelaere K, Hoorens A, Haentjens P, Delvaux G. Laparoscopic versus open resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1546–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melstrom LG, Phillips JD, Bentrem DJ, Wayne JD. Laparoscopic versus open resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012;35:451–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee HH, Hur H, Jung H, Park CH, Jeon HM, Song KY. Laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumors: a size-location matched case–control study. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:195–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pucci MJ, Berger AC, Lim PW, Chojnacki KA, Rosato EL, Palazzo F. Laparoscopic approaches to gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an institutional review of 57 cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3509–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen K, Zhou YC, Mou YP, Xu XW, Jin WW, Ajoodhea H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:355–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basso N, Silecchia G, Pizzuto G, Surgo D, Picconi T, Materia A. Laparoscopic excision of posterior gastric wall leiomyoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;6:65–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tagaya N, Mikami H, Kogure H, Kubota K, Hosoya Y, Nagai H. Laparoscopic intragastric stapled resection of gastric submucosal tumors located near the esophagogastric junction. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:177–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Motson RW, Fisher PW, Dawson JW. Laparoscopic resection of a benign intragastric stromal tumour. Br J Surg. 1995;82:1670.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar