Increased incidence of postoperative infections during prophylaxis with cephalothin compared to doxycycline in intestinal surgery
© Baatrup et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 19 March 2009
Accepted: 7 December 2009
Published: 7 December 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Mar 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shin Fujita|
|5 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tsuyoshi Konishi|
|30 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Gunnar Baatrup|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tsuyoshi Konishi|
|21 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Damien Jolley|
|28 Oct 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Gunnar Baatrup|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Oct 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Nov 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Gunnar Baatrup|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|25 Nov 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|7 Dec 2009||Editorially accepted|
|7 Dec 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-9-17|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.