Aortic replacement in aorto-occlusive disease: an observational study
© Morris-Stiff et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 01 November 2007
Accepted: 31 October 2008
Published: 31 October 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Nov 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Czerny|
|18 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francisco Criado|
|2 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Skelly|
|5 Mar 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Gareth Morris-Stiff|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Mar 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Apr 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Czerny|
|1 Jul 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ijaz Khan|
|24 Jul 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Gareth Morris-Stiff|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Jul 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Oct 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Gareth Morris-Stiff|
|2 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Malek Massad|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Oct 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Oct 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Gareth Morris-Stiff|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|19 Oct 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|31 Oct 2008||Editorially accepted|
|31 Oct 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-8-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.