The Anal Fistula Plug versus the mucosal advancement flap for the treatment of Anorectal Fistula (PLUG trial)
© van Koperen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 20 May 2008
Accepted: 23 June 2008
Published: 23 June 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 May 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Jun 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francis Seow-Choen|
|16 Jun 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Paul van Koperen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Jun 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Jun 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Paul van Koperen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Jun 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Jun 2008||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jun 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-8-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.