Splenectomy and proximal lieno-renal shunt in a factor five deficient patient with extra-hepatic portal vein obstruction
© Chava et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 20 September 2005
Accepted: 19 May 2006
Published: 19 May 2006
The clinico-surgical implication and successful management of a rare case of factor five (V) deficiency with portal hypertension and hypersplenism due to idiopathic extra-hepatic portal venous obstruction is presented.
A 16-year old boy had gastro-esophageal variceal bleeding, splenomegaly and hypersplenism. During preoperative workup prolonged prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time were detected, which on further evaluation turned out to be due to factor V deficiency. Proximal lieno-renal shunt and splenectomy were successfully performed with transfusion of fresh frozen plasma during and after the surgical procedure. At surgery there was no excessive bleeding. The perioperative course was uneventful and the patient is doing well on follow up.
Surgical portal decompressive procedures can be safely undertaken in clotting factor deficient patients with portal hypertension if meticulous surgical hemostasis is achieved at operation and the deficient factor is adequately replaced in the perioperative period.
Congenital deficiency of factor V (parahemophilia) is a rare inherited disorder of coagulation which appears to follow an autosomal recessive or partially dominant pattern [1–4]. Although the clinical features are rather mild compared with hemophilia, any surgical procedure undertaken without replacement therapy is uniformly complicated by excessive hemorrhage [1, 2, 5]. As factor V concentrate is not available, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is the only available source of factor V at the present time. We report a boy with extra-hepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO), portal hypertension and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) hemorrhage who also had factor V deficiency. Although many congenital anomalies such as cleft palate, mental retardation, short stature, syndactyly, atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, coarctation of aorta, duplication of the genitourinary collecting system have been associated with congenital deficiency of factor V [1–4], the simultaneous occurrence of factor V deficiency with EHPVO has not been described till date. EHPVO is a relatively common cause of portal hypertension in India, especially in the younger age group [6, 7]. Many causes, such as congenital, umbilical sepsis, recurrent childhood diarrhoea, dehydration, intra-abdominal infection, malnutrition and neonatal exchange transfusion have been postulated [6, 8]. The aetiology of EHPVO still remains unclear and in most it is labelled idiopathic.
Results of laboratory investigations in the patient with factor V deficiency and EHPVO
Coagulation parameters before transfusion of fresh frozen plasma
Pre-transfusion Thromboelastographic parameters
Reaction time (R)
Coagulation time (K)
Maximum Amplitude (MA)
29.5 mm (48–60 mm)
22.5 degrees (29–43 degrees)
-3.4 (-2 to +2)
Coagulation parameters after transfusion of fresh frozen plasma
Post-transfusion Thromboelastographic parameters
Reaction time (R)
Coagulation time (K)
Maximum Amplitude (MA)
36 mm (48–60 mm)
26.5 degrees (29–43 degrees)
-2.6 (-2 to +2)
The possible problems during surgery with regard to excessive bleeding were explained to the parents and an informed written consent was obtained. A clinical haematologist saw the patient and a plan for pre and peri-operative FFP infusions with coagulation monitoring was decided upon. The patient was transfused 1500 ml of FFP the day before operation. Following transfusion the PT, APTT and TEG significantly improved (Table 1), although they did not normalize. He was transfused 900 ml of FFP over 3 hours just before the start of the operation. He underwent splenectomy and proximal lieno-renal shunt (PLRS) through a left thoraco-abdominal incision (8th intercostal space) using a standardized surgical technique described by us previously . The intra-operative blood loss was 1000 ml. During the operation he received two units of packed cells and 750 ml of FFP. The operative time was 4 hours and the patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout the procedure. Postoperatively he received 600 ml of FFP every 12 hours for the first 48 hours followed by 450 ml of FFP every 12 hours for the next 48 hours. There was no bleeding from the drain sites and the wounds healed well without haematoma formation. Abdominal drain and chest tube were removed on 3rd and 8th postoperative days, respectively. Patient had high spiking fever ranging between 39°C–40°C in the initial postoperative period. Although the patient was initially started on i.v. amoxicillin with clavulinic acid and amikacin as per our protocol, antibiotics were changed to teicoplanin and piperacillin-tazobactam on the 3rd postoperative day. He became afebrile on the 6th postoperative day and intravenous antibiotics were continued till 10th postoperative day. Cultures from blood, urine and drain fluids were repeatedly sterile. An ultrasound evaluation did not reveal any subphrenic or intra-abdominal collection. He was discharged on the 12th postoperative day. Following discharge, at 4 months follow-up, the patient has had no recurrence of variceal bleeding and no evidence of hypersplenism (hemoglobin- 11 gm/dl, total leukocyte count- 6600/mm3, platelets- 325,000/mm33). A Doppler ultrasound study showed a patent lieno-renal shunt.
Factor V (labile factor or proaccelerin) is a large single chain glycoprotein (2196 amino acids) and the gene for factor V is located on chromosome 1 q21-q25. The average plasma concentration of factor V is 6.6 μg/ml (20 nmol/L). Platelets contain approximately 18–25% of the factor V in whole blood, within ά granules. Liver appears to be the primary site of factor V biosynthesis. Procofactor V does not bind factor Xa and is essentially completely inactive. The primary catalyst of factor V activation in-vivo is ά-thrombin. Activation of procofactor V yields the functional form of factor Va which acts as a cofactor for the serine protease factor Xa in the prothrombinase complex and leads to a rate enhancement of almost 300,000 fold in the process of factor Xa activation of prothrombin . Factor V is an extremely labile protein and is rapidly degraded in stored blood or plasma. As no factor V concentrate or recombinant factor V is available, treatment consists of fresh frozen plasma (FFP). The half-life of factor V is probably about 12 to 15 hours although a range from 4.5 to 36 hours has been described [1–5, 9]. More rapid disappearance is expected during surgery due to bleeding. In this context it is pertinent to state that infusions of solvent/detergent (S/D) plasma have been shown to have significant reductions in the activity of factors V, VIII and protein S. Hence its use is not considered appropriate for patients with factor V deficiency undergoing surgery, even though the risks of viral transmission are significantly lower with S/D plasma when compared to FFP .
Congenital deficiency of factor five or parahemophilia is an extremely rare disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 1 million . Less than 200 cases of inherited factor five deficiency have been reported since its first description by Owren in 1947 in a woman with menorrhagia . Combined factor V and VIII deficiency has also been described and probably occurs more commonly than factor V deficiency alone. It is an autosomal recessive trait [1, 2, 4], manifests clinically only in patients who inherit defective genes from both the parents. Other modes of inheritance have been implicated in certain kindreds [2, 3]. In heterozygotes, the level of factor five in plasma is approximately half of the normal and the carriers are easily identifiable by routine laboratory studies . A recent study detailing molecular analysis of factor V gene in patients with severe factor V deficiency revealed 9 different mutations . These researchers felt that there was a high level of allelic heterogeneity in these cases with a large number of "private" mutations in FV-deficient families. For this reason they recommend a full mutational screening of FV gene in affected individuals for a complete molecular diagnosis.
The clinical features are rather mild compared with hemophilia and the patients experience few bleeding problems in daily life but experience bleeding complications following dental extraction, severe trauma or surgery. The goal of hematologic management in the perioperative period is to maintain sufficient levels of clotting factors for a sufficient period of time to prevent bleeding complications. Conventional regimen for patients with congenital clotting factor deficiency undergoing major elective surgery is to bring patient's plasma level to 100% just prior to surgery, maintain a level greater than 60% for 4 days and a level greater than 40% for 4 days . However, the safe plasma factor V level for major surgery is thought to be 25% to 33% and there are case reports where elective surgery has been successfully performed above that level. In one of the reports bleeding occurred 54 and 78 hours following dental extraction and factor V levels at these times were 24% and 18% of normal, respectively . Hence, it is important to maintain adequate levels of factor V in the postoperative period. Recommended dosage of FFP replenishment in these patients undergoing major surgery is 20 ml/kg of body weight as loading dose over 3–4 h to prevent the adverse effects of volume overload followed by 10 ml/kg every 12–24 hours , as has been used by us. This high dose regimen recommended for severe factor V deficient individuals was deliberately chosen because the exact level of factor V activity was not available to us. This technical limitation forced us to 'err' on the side of surgical safety as haemorrhage during the surgery for portal hypertension could have been lethal.
The simultaneous occurrence of factor V deficiency with EHPVO has not been described till date. We have not encountered a single case of factor V deficiency in 808 cases of EHPVO we have operated on since 1976 [[6, 7] and unpublished data]. EHPVO is a relatively common cause of portal hypertension in India, especially in the younger age group [6, 7]. Splenectomy and PLRS is an effective treatment (secondary prophylaxis) for this condition and is successful in preventing variceal rebleeding in almost 90% of cases . This operation also takes care of the large splenomegaly and associated hypersplenism. As the liver function is normal in these patients, PLRS is not associated with post shunt encephalopathy. PLRS is considered a major undertaking with a potential for significant morbidity and mortality, and many prefer endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) for the control of esophageal varices. These patients usually have multiple collateral vessels in the lienorenal and gastrosplenic ligaments, splenic attachments to the diaphragm and in the retroperitoneum around splenic and renal vessels. As mobilization of the spleen and splenic vein may cause significant hemorrhage, painstaking ligation of these collaterals during splenectomy and meticulous dissection of often thin walled, distended and friable splenic vein from pancreatic tail is required. However, in centers with substantial experience the complication rate is low; our own elective mortality rate for PLRS is 0.7%, variceal rebleeding rate is 11% and encephalopathy rate is zero . Moreover, PLRS is a one time procedure for EHPVO which treats the painfully enlarged spleen, hypersplenism and portal hypertension all at the same time. It eliminates the risk of variceal bleeding immediately whereas EST takes an average of 8 sittings over many months to obliterate varices . The patient remains at risk of rebleed until the varices are obliterated. Also, following EST the portal system is not decompressed and these patients are at 16% risk of variceal recurrence in esophagus  and 11% develop new varices in stomach , with consequent high rebleed rates, as had happened in our patient following EST. These patients are also at risk of development of ectopic varices and bile duct varices with portal biliopathy following EST. Hence there is a strong case for decompressive shunt surgery in these EHPVO patients particularly in Indian conditions where access to tertiary medical care and safe blood banks is limited.
A patient with coagulation disorder is more likely to be at risk of recurrent life threatening gastrointestinal bleeding from portal hypertension and blood-borne viral diseases and are consequently more likely to benefit from an effective portal decompressive procedure. Our experience with this case suggests that this surgical procedure can be safely undertaken in clotting factor deficient patients with non cirrhotic portal hypertension if meticulous surgical hemostasis is achieved at operation and the deficient factor is adequately replaced in the perioperative period until wound healing has sufficiently progressed to prevent further bleeding.
activated partial thromboplastin time
extra-hepatic portal venous obstruction
fresh frozen plasma
proximal lieno-renal shunt
- Tsuda H, Mizuno Y, Hara T, Ohtsuki T, Ueda K, Matsuzaki K, Watanabe T: A case of congenital factor V deficiency combined with multiple congenital anomalies: successful management of palatoplasty. Acta Haematol. 1990, 83: 49-52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seeler RA: Parahemophilia. Factor V deficiency. Med Clin North Am. 1972, 56: 119-25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melliger EJ, Duckert F: Major surgery in a subject with factor Vdeficiency. Cholecystectomy in a parahaemophilic woman and review of the literature. Thromb Diath Haemorrh. 1971, 25: 438-46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brummel-Ziedins K, Orfeo T, Jenny NS, Everse SJ, Mann KG: Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis. Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology. Edited by: Greer JP, Rodgers GM, Foerster J, Paraskevas F, Lukens JN, Glader B. 2004, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 677-774. 11Google Scholar
- Webster WP, Roberts HR, Penick GD: Hemostasis in Factor V deficiency. Am J Med Sci. 1964, 248: 194-202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sahni P, Pande GK, Nundy S: Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction. Br J Surg. 1990, 77: 1201-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prasad AS, Gupta S, Kohli V, Pande GK, Sahni P, Nundy S: Proximal Splenorenal Shunts for Extrahepatic Portal VenousObstruction in Children. Ann Surg. 1994, 19: 193-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Webb LJ, Sherlock S: The aetiology, presentation and natural history of extra-hepatic portal venous obstruction. Q J Med. 1979, 48: 627-39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yotsumoto G, Masuda H, Toyokawa K, Iguro Y, Kinjo T, Sakata R: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in a patient with congenitalfactor V deficiency: report of a case. Surg Today. 2005, 35: 142-4. 10.1007/s00595-004-2892-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doyle S, O'Brien P, Murphy K, Fleming C, O'Donnell J: Coagulation factor content of solvent/detergent plasma compared with fresh frozen plasma. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2003, 14: 283-7. 10.1097/00001721-200304000-00010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedman KD, Rodgers GM: Inherited coagulation disorders. Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology. Edited by: Greer JP, Rodgers GM, Foerster J, Paraskevas F, Lukens JN, Glader B. 2004, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1619-1668. 11Google Scholar
- Owren PA: Parahaemophilia. Haemorrhagic diathesis due to absence of a previously unknown clotting factor. Lancet. 1947, 1: 446-10.1016/S0140-6736(47)91941-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Montefusco MC, Duga S, Asselta R, Malcovati M, Peyvandi F, Santagostino E: Clinical and molecular characterization of 6 patients affected by severe deficiency of coagulation factorV:broadening of the mutational spectrum of factorV gene and in vitro analysisof the newly identified missense mutations. Blood. 2003, 102: 3210-3216. 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0922.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krieger JN, Hilgartner MW, Redo SF: Surgery in patients with congenital disorders of blood coagulation. Ann Surg. 1977, 185: 290-4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bhargava DK, Dwivedi M, Dasarathy S, Arora A: Endoscopic sclerotherapy for portal hypertension due to extrahepatic obstruction: long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989, 35: 309-11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chawla YK, Dilawari JB, Ramesh GN, Kaur U, Mitra SK, Walia BN: Sclerotherapy in extrahepatic portal venous obstruction. Gut. 1990, 31: 213-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2482/6/7/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.