Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Non-randomised patients in a cholecystectomy trial: characteristics, procedures, and outcomes

  • Axel Ros1,
  • Per Carlsson2,
  • Mikael Rahmqvist2,
  • Karin Bäckman2 and
  • Erik Nilsson3Email author
BMC Surgery20066:17

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-6-17

Received: 15 May 2006

Accepted: 26 December 2006

Published: 26 December 2006

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 May 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peer Wille-Joergensen
27 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leslie Huson
7 Dec 2006 Author responded Author comments - Erik Nilsson
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Dec 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 Dec 2006 Editorially accepted
26 Dec 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2482-6-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, County Hospital of Ryhov
(2)
Center for Medical Technology Assessment, Linköping University
(3)
Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Umeå

Advertisement