Totally laparoscopic versus conventional ileoanal pouch procedure – design of a single-centre, expertise based randomised controlled trial to compare the laparoscopic and conventional surgical approach in patients undergoing primary elective restorative proctocolectomy- LapConPouch-Trial
© Antolovic et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 10 May 2006
Accepted: 24 November 2006
Published: 24 November 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 May 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Jul 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Diamond|
|26 Sep 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Dalibor Antolovic|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Sep 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Nov 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Dalibor Antolovic|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Nov 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Nov 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Dalibor Antolovic|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Nov 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Nov 2006||Editorially accepted|
|24 Nov 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-6-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.