Electrophysiological evaluation of phrenic nerve injury during cardiac surgery – a prospective, controlled, clinical study
© Canbaz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 23 August 2003
Accepted: 14 January 2004
Published: 14 January 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Aug 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yuksel Atay|
|25 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Javier Arpa|
|8 Oct 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Suat Canbaz|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Oct 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yuksel Atay|
|16 Dec 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Javier Arpa|
|30 Dec 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Suat Canbaz|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Dec 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jan 2004||Editorially accepted|
|14 Jan 2004||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-4-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.