Development of a perioperative medicine research agenda: a cross sectional survey
© Khan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 10 February 2004
Accepted: 20 September 2004
Published: 20 September 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Feb 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Feb 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Harrison Weed|
|5 May 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Suzanne Beyea|
|15 Jul 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Nadia Khan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Jul 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Sep 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Nadia Khan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Sep 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Sep 2004||Editorially accepted|
|20 Sep 2004||Article published||10.1186/1471-2482-4-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.