Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Development of a perioperative medicine research agenda: a cross sectional survey

  • Nadia A Khan1Email author,
  • Taha Taher2,
  • Finlay A McAlister2,
  • Andre Ferland1,
  • Norman R Campbell1,
  • William A Ghali1 and
  • for the Canadian Perioperative Research Group
BMC Surgery20044:11

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-4-11

Received: 10 February 2004

Accepted: 20 September 2004

Published: 20 September 2004

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Feb 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Feb 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Harrison Weed
5 May 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suzanne Beyea
15 Jul 2004 Author responded Author comments - Nadia Khan
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jul 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Sep 2004 Author responded Author comments - Nadia Khan
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Sep 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
20 Sep 2004 Editorially accepted
20 Sep 2004 Article published 10.1186/1471-2482-4-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary
(2)
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Walter Mackenzie Center

Advertisement